Create an account and get 3 free clips per day.
Chapters
L1 M.U.S.T. placement
L1 M.U.S.T. placement
2016adultchapterdecompressionMedactaNASSnoindexoctogenariansstenosisstenotic
Treatment Options- Carotid Endarterectomy (CEA) | Carotid Interventions: CAE, CAS, & TCAR
Treatment Options- Carotid Endarterectomy (CEA) | Carotid Interventions: CAE, CAS, & TCAR
anesthesiaanestheticarterycarotidcarotid arterychapterclotcomparingdistallyexternalexternal carotidflowincisioninternalinternal carotidissuelongitudinalloopsmedicalpatientpatientsplaqueproximalstenosisstenoticstentstentingstrokesurgerytherapyultimatelyvascularvesselwound
Data- The Story Behind the Numbers | Innovation and Application of Real Time Nursing Dashboards
Data- The Story Behind the Numbers | Innovation and Application of Real Time Nursing Dashboards
bridgingcapacitychapterchrisdatahelpedjeannejourneyleadersmetricsNoneorganizationradiologyreviewseniorstaffstartstrategicsustainableunderstandworkflow
Treatment Options- CAS- Embolic Protection Device (EPD)- Distal Protection | Carotid Interventions: CAE, CAS, & TCAR
Treatment Options- CAS- Embolic Protection Device (EPD)- Distal Protection | Carotid Interventions: CAE, CAS, & TCAR
arteriesarteryaspirateballoonbasketbloodbraincapturecarotidcarotid arterycerebralchapterclinicaldebrisdevicedistaldistallyembolicfilterfiltersflowincompleteinternalinternal carotidlesionlesionsoversizeparticlespatientperfectphenomenonplaqueprotectedprotectionproximalsheathstenosisstentstentingstrokestrokesthrombustinyultimatelyvesselwire
Pharmacology- Opiods | Procedural Sedation: An Education Review
Pharmacology- Opiods | Procedural Sedation: An Education Review
acutechapterdrugelderlyfentanylinactiveinhibitorsintubationmedicationsmetabolitesmetabolizedmilligrammorphinenarcanNonenurseopioidpatientspharmacokineticpotentproteinrenalresidentversed
Human Factors Engineering- What is it? | Looking for risk in all the Right Places: The Anatomy of Errors in Healthcare
Human Factors Engineering- What is it? | Looking for risk in all the Right Places: The Anatomy of Errors in Healthcare
anesthesiaanesthesiologistanesthesiologychapterdisciplineengineeringfactorshealthcarehumanislandmonitorNonenuclearpatient
Bland Embolization | Interventional Oncology
Bland Embolization | Interventional Oncology
ablationablativeadministeringagentangiogramanteriorbeadsblandbloodceliacchapterchemocompleteelutingembolicembolizationembolizedhcchumerusischemialesionmetastaticnecrosispathologicpatientpedicleperformrehabresectionsegmentsequentiallysupplytherapytumor
Renal Ablation | Interventional Oncology
Renal Ablation | Interventional Oncology
ablationcardiomyopathycentimeterchaptereffusionembolizedfamiliallesionmetastaticparenchymalpatientpleuralrenalspleensurgerytolerated
Cone Beam CT | Interventional Oncology
Cone Beam CT | Interventional Oncology
ablationanatomicangioarteriesarteryartifactbeamchaptercombconecontrastdoseembolicenhancementenhancesesophagealesophagusgastricgastric arteryglucagonhcchepatectomyinfusinglesionliverlysisoncologypatientsegmentstomach
Indirect Angiography | Interventional Oncology
Indirect Angiography | Interventional Oncology
ablateablationablativeaneurysmangioangiographybeamBrachytherapycandidateschapterdefinitivelyembolizationentirehccindirectintentinterdisciplinaryischemiclesionographypatientportalresectionsbrtsurgicaltherapyvein
Ablative Radioembolization | Interventional Oncology
Ablative Radioembolization | Interventional Oncology
adjacentadministerarterialbladecancerchaptercompletedosedosesentiregreyinvadinglesionliverlobelobectomynecrosispathologicpatientportalremnantresectionresponsesegmentsurgeontinytreattumorvein
Why is Staging Important | Interventional Oncology
Why is Staging Important | Interventional Oncology
ablateablationangiogramchapterhepatocellularhyperintensityMRIshapedtumor
The Ablation Concept | Interventional Oncology
The Ablation Concept | Interventional Oncology
ablationablativebifurcationbilebiliarycelsiuschaptercolorectalcontrastcryoablationcurrendegreesductexpirationgeneratesgrayhepatectomyinvolvinglesionmicrowavemodalitiesprobesradiofrequencyrapidstricturestumortumorsureterzone
Pre-procedure Assessment | Procedural Sedation: An Education Review
Pre-procedure Assessment | Procedural Sedation: An Education Review
abnormalitiesadverseairwayanesthesiaanesthesiologistapneaauscultationcervicalchaptercomorbiditiescopddiseaseedemaejectionfractionhabitushemodynamicallylitersmedicationsneckneurologicNonepatientpatientsphysiologicproceduralpulmonaryrenalsedationsleepslidesspinestatus
Why Treat Carotid Occlusive Disease? | Carotid Interventions: CAE, CAS, & TCAR
Why Treat Carotid Occlusive Disease? | Carotid Interventions: CAE, CAS, & TCAR
asymptomaticcarotidchapterdiseasehemorrhagicischemicleadingneurologicocclusivepatientsstenosisstrokestrokessymptomaticsymptomsworrisome
Pharmacology- Benzodiazepines | Procedural Sedation: An Education Review
Pharmacology- Benzodiazepines | Procedural Sedation: An Education Review
actionantagonistbenzodiazepinebenzodiazepineschapterdrugdurationexcretedexcretionflumazenilgabamedicationmetabolismmetabolitesmilligramNoneproceduralproteinrequireresponsiblereversalsedationseizureversed
Administration | Procedural Sedation: An Education Review
Administration | Procedural Sedation: An Education Review
benzodiazepinechaptercrnadosedrugfentanylgeneticinteractionsmidazolammilligramNoneopioidpainfulpatientpeakpharmacokineticprocedurereceptorsedatedsynergistictitrationversed
Pharmacology- Versed | Procedural Sedation: An Education Review
Pharmacology- Versed | Procedural Sedation: An Education Review
albuminchaptercirculatingdrugenzymeexcretedkidneymetabolitemetabolizedneuralNoneopioidspatientsprolongedprophylaxisproteinvasospasmverapamilversed
Background on Interventional Oncology | Interventional Oncology
Background on Interventional Oncology | Interventional Oncology
bloodcarcinomachapterdilatorinterventionalischemiaoncologypatientsradiologistresectionspecialtystenosistreatmenttumortumors
Pharmacology- Antagonists & Additional Medications | Procedural Sedation: An Education Review
Pharmacology- Antagonists & Additional Medications | Procedural Sedation: An Education Review
anesthesiologistanesthesiologistsbenzodiazepinesbolusbradycardiachapterdosedrugflumazenilguidelineshypotensioninfusionmedicationsmehtamonitornarcanNoneopioidpotentpropofolreversalsedationversed
Airway Assessment | Procedural Sedation: An Education Review
Airway Assessment | Procedural Sedation: An Education Review
airwayanesthesiologistangiogramapneachaptercongestivecopddifficultyeffectivehabituslungsmaskmusculatureNonepatientpatientspharmacologyproceduralproviderssealsedatedsedationstiffventilationwaveform
Q&A- Procedural Sedation | Procedural Sedation: An Education Review
Q&A- Procedural Sedation | Procedural Sedation: An Education Review
adverseanesthesiaanesthesiologistanesthesiologistsarrhythmiablockscardiacchaptercomfortablediazepamdosingeffectselectiveembolizationfibroidhyperkalemiainstitutionlabsNoneopioidoutcomespatientpatientspeakperioperativepharmacokineticsprocedurepropofolprotocolproviderproviderssedatedsedationserumuterineversed
Treatment Options- TransCarotid Artery Revascularization- TCAR | Carotid Interventions: CAE, CAS, & TCAR
Treatment Options- TransCarotid Artery Revascularization- TCAR | Carotid Interventions: CAE, CAS, & TCAR
angiographyangioplastyarterybleedbloodcalcifiedcarotidchapterclaviclecommondebrisdevicedistalembolicembolizationexposurefemoralflowimageincisioninstitutionlabeledpatientprocedureprofileproximalreversalreversesheathstenosisstentstentingstepwisesurgicalsuturedsystemultimatelyveinvenousvessel
Treatment Options- Carotid Artery Stenting (CAS) | Carotid Interventions: CAE, CAS, & TCAR
Treatment Options- Carotid Artery Stenting (CAS) | Carotid Interventions: CAE, CAS, & TCAR
antiplateletarterybraincarotidchapterdualembolicmedicareplavixprocedureprotectionproximalstenosisstentstentingtherapy
Practice Guidelines | Procedural Sedation: An Education Review
Practice Guidelines | Procedural Sedation: An Education Review
anesthesiologistassessmentbeneficialcategorychaptercontrolenhancingequivocalevidencefindingsguidelineguidelinesinterventionallabeledliteraturemonitoringNoneobservationalopinionoutcomespatientpharmacologypracticeproceduralprocedureradiologyrandomizedrecommendationsreviewsedationstatisticallystudiestrialsversus
Intraprocedure | Procedural Sedation: An Education Review
Intraprocedure | Procedural Sedation: An Education Review
airwayanxietycannulachapterdepressioneventualhaloindicatorinstitutionlitigationmaskminutesnasalNonepatientpatientsproceduralprocedurerespiratoryresponserobotsedationsettingventilationventilatoryverbal
Muscoskeletal Ablation | Interventional Oncology
Muscoskeletal Ablation | Interventional Oncology
ablateablatingbonescannulatedcementchaptercryoiliacmalignancymusculoskeletalorthopedicpercutaneoustumor
Pulmonary Ablation | Interventional Oncology
Pulmonary Ablation | Interventional Oncology
ablationactivitycancercandidatechaptercolorectalcryodiseaselesionslobelungmetastaticnodulepatientpulmonaryrecurrecurredresectionresidualscansurgical
Radioembolization | Interventional Oncology
Radioembolization | Interventional Oncology
bloodstreambremsstrahlungchapterdoseexistshccimrtlivermetastaticmultifocalneuroendocrineparticlepatientportalradiationsbrttumortumorsvascularvisualization
Why Interventional Oncology | Interventional Oncology
Why Interventional Oncology | Interventional Oncology
ablationcenterschapterhccinterventionallivermetastaticoncologypalliationprimaryradiologyresectiontechniquetherapytoleratedtreatmentstumortumors
Transcript

Do you have a straight ball tip? [inaudible] I do and not so far. So certainly for

adult degen whether it's adult degen deformity or not I'm frequently doing total [inaudible] ectomy with or without a TPLIF TLIF. Just to get a decompression. Keep in mind my patients are stenotic octogenarians with three point stenosis every single one of them. That's my plain vanilla patient.

So I take a lot just to get the decompression done.

it's obviously either done with general

anesthesia or perhaps a regional block at our institution is generally done with general anesthesia we have a really combined vascular well developed combined vascular practice we work closely with our surgeons as well as

you know those who are involved in the vascular interventional space as far as the ir docs and and in this setting they would do generally general anesthetic and a longitudinal neck incision so you've got that and the need for that to

heal ultimately dissect out the internal carotid the external carotid common carotid and get vessel loops and good control over each of those and then once you have all of that you hyper NIH's the patient systemically not unlike what we

do in the angio suite and then they make a nice longer-term longitudinal incision on the carotid you spot scissors to cut those up and they actually find that plaque you can see that plaque that's shown there it's you know actually

pretty impressive if you've seen it and let's want to show an illustrative picture there ultimately that's open that's removed you don't get the entirety of the plaque inside the vessel but they get as much as they can and

then they kind of pull and yank and that's one of the pitfalls of this procedure I think ultimately is you don't get all of it you get a lot more than you realize is they're on on angiography but you don't get all of it

and whatever is left sometimes can be sometimes worse off and then ultimately you close the wound reverse the heparin and closed closed it overall and hope that they don't have an issue with wound healing don't have an issue with a

general anesthetic and don't have a stroke in the interim while they've clamped and controlled the vessel above and below so here's a case example from our institution in the past year this is a critical asymptomatic left internal

carotid artery stenosis pretty stenotic it almost looks like it's vocally occluded you can see that doesn't look very long it's in the proximal internal carotid artery you can see actually the proximal external carotid artery which

is that kind of fat vessel anteriorly also looks stenotic and so it's going to be addressed as well and this is how they treated it this is the exposure in this particular patient big incision extractors place and you can see vessel

loops up along the internal and external carotid arteries distally along some early branches of the external carotid artery off to the side and then down below in the common core artery and ultimately you get good vessel control

you clamp before you make the incision ultimately take out a plaque that looks like this look how extensive that plaque is compared to what you saw in the CT scan so it's not it's generally much more

impressive what's inside the vessel than what you appreciate on imaging but it's the focal stenosis that's the issue so ultimately if yet if the patient was a candidate stenting then you just place a stent

across that and he stabilized this plaque that's been removed and essentially plasti to that within the stent so it doesn't allow any thrombus to break off of this plaque and embolize up to the brain that's the issue of raw

it's the flow through there becomes much more turbulent as the narrowing occurs with this blockage and it's that turbulent flow that causes clot or even a small amount of clot to lodge up distally within the intrical in

terrestrial vasculature so that's the issue here at all if you don't take all that plaque out that's fine as long as you can improve the turbulent blood flow with this stent but this is not without risk so you take that plaque out which

looks pretty bad but there are some complications right so major minor stroke in death an asset which is a trial that's frequently quoted this is really this trial that was looking at medical therapy versus carotid surgery

five point eight percent of patients had some type of stroke major minor so that's not insignificant you get all that plaque out but if you know one in twenty you get a significant stroke then that's not so bad I'm not so good right

so but even if they don't get a stroke they might get a nerve palsy they might get a hematoma they may get a wound infection or even a cardiovascular event so nothing happens in the carotid but the heart has an issue because the

blockages that we have in the carotid are happening in the legs are happening in the coronary so those patients go through a stress event the general anesthetic the surgery incision whatever and then recovery from that I actually

put some stress on the whole body overall and they may get an mi so that's always an issue as well so can we do something less invasive this is actually a listing of the trials the talk is going to be available to you guys so I'm

not going to go through each of this but this is comparing medical therapy which I started with and surgery and comparing the two options per treatment and showing that in certain symptomatic patients if they have significant

stenosis which is deemed greater than 70% you may be better off treating them with surgery or stenting than with best medical therapy and as we've gotten better and better with being more aggressive with best medical therapy

this is moving a little bit but here's the criteria for treatment and so you have that available to you but really is

as Chris described to you we really walked this journey around bridging the data gap from our front lines all the way to our senior leaders and we thought

this was very important because we didn't think we could drive a sustainable organization if everyone was not on the same page or even in the same book so we had to start helping the staff understand the story behind the

numbers and help them understand that every number actually has a story and is connected to their work it's not just random numbers these are things that also define patient care and can help us improve the way that we take care of our

patients and so the scorecards were really key in creating that alignment across the organization because as you can see on this chart here the senior leaders the radiology mid-level leaders and the

frontline staff all review the scorecards so AB monthly staff meetings the radio radiology leaders review the scorecards with the frontline staff and then we have our radiology director and our clinical chair review the scorecards

with the institutional senior leaders as well so all across the organization everyone had the same understanding around performance and if there was a strategy strategic vision that our senior leaders had they could easily see

how we could accomplish that based on the numbers that we had on our scorecard and then when it came to the dashboards these were as Chris mentioned more real-time frontline tools that were applied by our staff and but the metrics

on the dashboards were also included on the scorecards as well so when we designed the dashboard we pulled some metrics from the scorecards and thought about which which of these metrics would be more relevant in real time for our

frontline staff and so that way we restraints where we were continuing to build that competency for our frontline staff to help them to understand how to use data to drive decision-making in real-time and finally when it came to

the strategic plan we still have our senior leaders design strategic plans but our radiology leaders were able to move that strategic plan through our strategy to deployment program to define more specific strategies for radiology

and then roll that down to our frontline staff through their one on one performance management goals so this really helped us to start to create the same level of expectation across the organization as Chris mentioned we might

have senior leaders say well we have our strategic vision of increasing or falling by 10 percent over the next year and for our frontline staff that might be difficult because if they to them their work might be chaotic and they

think they cannot possibly do any more volume but when we presented the scorecard for example on s Chris showed in I arm at a 65 percent utilization everyone could see that if our benchmark was 80 to 85 percent we still had more

capacity in our rooms to be able to service more patients and on the same scorecard we could see our on-time start rate which was actually kind of low around 50% and so that helped us engage in conversation

with our frontline staff to help them understand that our issue was not necessarily a capacity issue we had the capacity to increase volume but the way that we were managing our workflow as you can see from an on-time start was

not great and so this helped them to start to identify projects that they could lead to help to manage their workflow better and with the dashboards they could actually see real-time improvement or real-time changes as they

made decisions around their workflows so again our goal to this journey or our journey to this one box was around bridging the data gap and to really create a sustainable organization where each frontline staff was empowered to

solve problems and have the data that they needed to do that objectively so now Jeanne will go over the current state of our nurses as we embark on that next steps of up - specific dashboards for them thanks to me

kind of the embolic protection because I think with carotid artery stenting the stents there's a lot of different types they're all self expanding for the most

part and there's not a lot to talk about there but there is with regards to embolic protection and there so there's distal and violent protection where you have this where that blue little sheath in the common carotid artery you got a

wire through the ica stenosis and a little basket or filter distally before you put the stent in early on they used to think oh maybe we'll do distal balloon occlusion put a balloon up distally do your intervention aspirate

whatever collects behind the balloon and then take the balloon down not so ideal because you never really asked for it a hundred percent of the debris and then whatever whenever you deflate the balloon it goes back it goes up to the

brain you still have some embolic phenomenon in the cerebral vascular churn and then there's this newer concept of proximal protection where you use either flow reversal reverse the blood flow in the cerebral circulation

or you actually cause a stagnant column of blood in the ica so you can't get you don't get anything that embolize is up distally but you have this stagnant column the debris collects there you aspirate that actively before you take

down the balloons that are in position in the X carotids and common carotid artery and then you take everything out so let's walk through each of these if you really wanted to pick out the perfect embolic

protection device it's got to be relatively easy to use it's got to be stable in position so it's not moving up and down and causing injury to the vessel but even while it's in place cerebral perfusion is maintained so that

balloon the distal balloon not a great idea because you're cutting off all the blood flow to the brain you might stop something from embolizing up distally but in the process of doing that you may patient may not tolerate that you want

complete protection during all aspects of the procedure so when we place a filter as you'll see just crossing the lesion with the initial filter can cause a distal embolus so that's a problem you want to be able to use your guide wire

choice as many of you know when we go through peripheral vasculature there's your go-to wires but it doesn't always work every time with that one go-to wire so you want to be able to pick the wire that you want to use or

change it up if needed for different lesions so if you get to use your wire of choice then then that's gonna be a better system than something that's man deter and then if you have a hard time using that wire to get across the lesion

you have a problem overall and then ultimately where do you land that protection device and a few diagrams here to help illustrate this generally speaking these distal embolic protection these filters that go beyond

the lesion have been used for quite a while and are relatively safe you can see them pretty easily and geographically they have little markers on them that signify if they're open or closed and we look for that overall and

blood flows through them it's just a little sieve a little basket that collects really tiny particles micrometers in size but allows blood flow to pass through it so you're not actually causing any cessation of blood

flow to the brain but you are protecting yourself from that embolic debris and it's generally well tolerated overall we had really good results in fact when not using this device there's a lot of strokes that were occurring in use of

this device dramatic reduction so a significant improvement in this procedural area by utilization of embolic protection however distal embolic protection or filter devices are not a perfect APD as you as you may know

those of you have been involved in carotid stenting there is no cerebral protection when you cross the lesion if you have a curlicue internal carotid artery this filter doesn't sit right and and ultimately may not cause

good protection or actually capture everything that breaks off the plaque and it can be difficult to deliver in those really tortuous internal carotid arteries so ultimately you can cross the lesion but you may not get this filter

up if you don't get the filter up you can't put the stent then ultimately you're out of luck so you gotta have a different option filters may not provide complete cerebral protection if they're not fully opposed and again it does

allow passage of really tiny particles right so your blood cells have to be able to pass but even though it's less than about a hundred microns may be significant enough to cause a significant stroke if it goes to the

right basket of territory so it's not perfect protection and then if you have so much debris you can actually overload the filter fill it up in tile and entirely and then you have a point where when you capture the filter there's some

residual debris that's never fully captured either so these are concerns and then ultimately with that filter in place you can cause a vessel dissection when you try to remove it or if it's bouncing up and down without good

stability you can cause spasm to the vessel as well and so these are the things that we look for frequently because we want to make sure that ultimately if we just sent the lesion but we don't believe the vessel distal

to it intact and we're going to have a problem so here's some kind of illustrated diagrams for this here's a sheath in the common carotid artery you see your plaque lesion in the internal carotid artery and you're trying to

cross this with that filter device that's what's the picture on the right but as you're crossing that lesion you're you're liberating a little plaque or debris which you see here and during that period of time until the filters in

place you're not protected so all that debris is going up to the brain so there's that first part of the procedure where you're not protected that's one of the pitfalls or concerns particularly with very stenotic lesions or friable

lesions like this where you're not protected until that filters in place that first step you never are protected in placement of a filter here's an example where you have a torturous internal carotid artery so you see this

real kink these are kinds of carotid internal carotid arteries that we can see and if you place that filter in that bend that you can see right at the bend there the bottom part the undersurface of the carotid doesn't have good wall

my position of the filter so debris can can slip past the filter on the under under surface of this which is a real phenomenon and you can see that you can say well what if we oversize the filter if you oversize the filter then it then

it just oval eyes Azure or it crimps and in folds on itself so you really have to size this to the specific vessel that you plan to target it in but just the the physics of this it's it's a tube think about a balloon a balloon doesn't

conform to this it tries to straighten everything out this isn't going to straighten the vessel out so it doesn't fully conform on the full end of the filter and you have incomplete a position and therefore

incomplete filtration so this is another failure mode I mentioned before what if it gets overloaded so here's a diagram where you have all this debris coming up it's filling up the really tiny tiny particles go past it because this little

micro sieve allows really small particles to go distal but approximately it's overloaded so now you get all this debris in there you place your stent you take your retrieval filter or catheter to take this filter out and all that

stuff that's sitting between the overloaded filter and your stent then gets liberated and goes up to the brain so you got to worry about that as well I mentioned this scenario that it builds up so much so that you can't get all the

debris out and ultimately you lose some and then when the filter is full and debris particles that are suspended near the stent or if you put that filter too close to the edge of the stent you run into problems where it may catch the

stent overall and you have all of this debris and it looks small and you don't really see it and geographically obviously but ultimately is when you do a stroke assessment and it's not always devastating strokes but mild symptoms

where he had a stroke neurologist and the crest trial or most of the more recent clinical trials we actually evaluate a patient and notice that they had small maybe sub sub clinical or mild strokes that were noted they weren't

perhaps devastating strokes but they had things that caused some degree of disability so not insignificant here's a case example of a carotid stent that was done this is a case out of Arizona proximal carotid

stenosis stent placed but then distal thrombus that developed in this case and had post rhombus removal after the epd was removed so there's thrombus overloaded the the filter you can see the filter at the very top of the center

image you can see the sort of the shadow of the embolic protection device there distally aspirated that took the filter out and then ultimately removed but you can imagine that amount of thrombus up in the brain would have been a

devastating stroke and this is what the filter looks like in real life so this is what the debris may look like so it's not this is not overloaded but that's significant debris and you can see the little film or sieve that's on the

distal part of this basket and that's what captures the debris any of that in the brain is gonna leave this patient with a residual stroke despite a successful stenting procedure so this is what we're trying to avoid so in spite

in providing the analgesic component of procedural sedation they activate opioid receptors in the brain and spinal cord to inhibit transmission of painful impulses fentanyl is the main drug that

we use the onset of action is seen in one to three minutes and the peak effect is seen in five to fifteen the half-life is two to four hours and we typically give a dose of 50 mics to start again it's metabolized by that cyp3a4 what's

especially I think important to note is that it gets metabolized to inactive metabolites so I had a situation when I was a newer nurse I was working in the ICU I had an elderly patient it was my third night with her and she was

admitted for acute kidney injury related to her urosepsis so she really wasn't making a lot of urine and she lives in an incredible amount of pain she has been screaming for two nights and I finally said enough I went to the

resident so we have to give her something so she said let's give her some morphine you want to give her one milligram she's elderly can we at least start with 0.5 and see how she does with that she said that's fine I gave her the

point for five of morphine and she went to sleep maybe thirty minutes later and she looked really comfortable now we didn't we don't or at that time we didn't use capnography for non intubated patience in my ICU I was in but she did

have a pulse oximeter on and all the other monitoring I didn't really disturb her throughout the night I knew she hadn't slept in two days so I would go in and check on her and turn her and see how she was doing and she seemed really

asleep but comfortable I go and do my bedside handover with the day nurse in the morning we go to wake her up and she's not waking up and we do a really good sternal rub and all your nail bed pressure and all those tricks

and nothing's working and she's she's out so we called in the attending in the resident and pees and they ended up doing an arterial blood bath and her paco2 was 75 yes so they did give her narcan and thankfully it worked and she

didn't require intubation the nurse practitioner pulled me over afterwards when things had settled down she said you know I want to talk to you about what happened why did you decide to give her morphine and start a fentanyl and I

said well you know morphine of aura fentanyl rather is a hundred times more potent than morphine and I thought I was doing the right thing because she's an elderly patient I was worried about her cuz she's frail but then she explained

to me that morphine gets metabolized to several different metabolites and one of them is actually 2 to 3 times more potent than the original morphine that you're giving in the IV and because she was in acute renal failure she wasn't

excreting the drug so she had this two to three times more potent drug just circulating around her system all night which led to her respiratory depression and her hypercarbia with fentanyl you have metabolism to inactive metabolites

so it's considered to be more safe for patients who are in renal failure that was a real big aha moment for me because there's a lot that you have to know when you're a nurse especially if you're working in a critical care area and you

hope that you're the providers you're working with are thinking of these things but they're also very stressed so it's all of our responsibilities to know the way that these drugs work and I think it's great in IR because we we

don't give it a lot of medications we give a fair amount but they're pretty much the same medications over and over so we do have an opportunity to really take a better deep dive and really the mechanism of action and their

pharmacokinetic properties considerations you do want to consider renal e impaired patients because it can alter the kinetics meaning that there's decrease protein binding as I said for versed but there is they are slightly

less protein bound than versed and there is a black box warning for cyp3a4 inhibitors specifically for fentanyl just something to keep in mind when you're giving it though I think this is really more I'm talking about patients

that are going home with a fentanyl patch you want to make sure they're not taking inhibitors at home kind of

get into human factors engineering so James riesen who were going to talk a little bit more about said we can't change the human condition but we can change the conditions under which humans work and this is the discipline that is

human factors engineering so it's a discipline that takes into account human strength and limitations in the design of interactive systems that involve people tools and technology and work environments to ensure safety most

notably or most recently they were involved in the restructuring or re-engineering of anesthesiology machines so you may remember a time when anesthesiology machines didn't even have a monitor a

patient monitor on him they were just the machine and they had the bellows on them on top that would go with the patient respirations so since that time they've been written a re-engineered to include a patient monitor further

reengineering took in human factors which is is the human condition and I'm going to get into some of those human factors a little bit later but we they took a look at the monitor to make it more clear and intuitive for the

anesthesiologist they also took a look at the alarms of these anesthesia machines to make sure that they were accurate and had a better range to prevent alarm fatigue and then lastly they put in some automation into those

machines human factors engineering is also used outside of healthcare in aviation automobiles so the backup camera that we enjoy at our cars that came from human factors engineering and also a Three Mile Island they used human

factors engineering when they looked at that accident that nuclear accident that took place those many years ago and they used what they learned from Three Mile Island to design much safer patients say sorry nuclear power plants so it's it's

not only used in healthcare but throughout all of our industries so

we're gonna move on to embolization there a couple different categories of embolization bland embolization is when

you just administering something that is choking off the blood supply to the tumor and that's how it's going to exert its effect here's a patient with a very large metastatic renal cell lesion to the humerus this is it on MRI this is it

per angiogram and this patient was opposed to undergo resection so we bland embolized it to reduce bleeding and I chose this one here because we used sequentially sized particles ranging from 100 to 200 all

the way up to 700 and you can actually if you look closely can see sort of beads stacked up in the vessel but that's all that it's doing it's just reducing the blood supply basically creating a stroke within the tumor that

works a fair amount of time and actually an HCC some folks believe that it were very similar to keep embolization which is where at you're administering a chemo embolic agent that is either l'p hi doll with the chemo agent suspended within it

or drug eluting beads the the Chinese have done some randomized studies on whether or not you can also put alcohol in the pie at all and that's something we've adopted in our practice too so anything that essentially is a chemical

outside of a bland agent can be considered a key mobilization so here's a large segment eight HCC we've all been here before we'll be seeing common femoral angiogram a selective celiac run you can make sure

the portals open in that segment find the anterior division pedicle it's going to it select it and this is after drug living bead embolization so this is a nice immediate response at one month a little bit of gas that's expected to be

within there however this patient had a 70% necrosis so it wasn't actually complete cell death and the reason is it's very hard to get to the absolute periphery of the blood supply to the tumor it is able to rehab just like a

stroke can rehab from collateral blood supply so what happens when you have a lesion like this one it's kind of right next to the cod a little bit difficult to see I can't see with ultrasound or CT well you can go in and tag it with lip

Idol and it's much more conspicuous you can perform what we call dual therapy or combination therapy where you perform a microwave ablation you can see the gas leaving the tumor and this is what it looks like afterwards this patient went

to transplant and this was a complete pathologic necrosis so you do need the concept of something that's ablative very frequently to achieve that complete pathologic necrosis rates very hard to do that with ischemia or chemotherapy

alone so what do you do we have a

different applications renal ablation is very common when do we use it

high surgical risk patients primary metastatic lesions some folks are actually refused surgery nowadays and saying I'll have a one centimeter reno lesion actually want this in lieu of surgery people have

familial syndromes they're prone to getting a renal cancer again so we're trying to preserve renal tissue it is the most renal parenchymal sparing modality and obviously have a single kidney and a lot of these are found

incidentally when they're getting a CT scan for something else here's a very sizable one the patient that has a cardiomyopathy can see how big the heart is so it's you know seven centimeter lesion off of the left to superior pole

against the spleen this patient wouldn't have tolerated bleeding very much so we went ahead and embolized it beforehand using alcohol in the pide all in a coil and this is what it looks like when you have all those individual ice probes all

set up within the lesion and you can see the ice forming around I don't know how well it projects but in real time you can determine if you've developed your margin we do encompass little bit of spleen with that and you can see here

that you have a faint rim surrounding that lesion right next to the spleen and that's the necrotic fat that's how you know that you got it all and just this ablation alone caused a very reactive pleural

effusion that you can see up on the CT over there so imagine how this patient would have tolerated surgery pulmonary

know we're running a bit short on time so I want to briefly just touch about

some techniques with comb beam CT which are very helpful to us there are a lot of reasons why you should use comb beam CT it gives us the the most extensive anatomic understanding of vascular territories and the implications for

that with oncology are extremely valuable because of things like margin like we discussed here's an example of a patient who had a high AF P and their bloodstream which tells us that they have a cancer in her liver we can't see

it on the CT there but if you do a cone beam CT it stands up quite nicely why because you're giving levels of contrast that if you were to give them through a peripheral IV it would be toxic to the patient but when you're infusing into a

segment the body tolerates at the problem so patient preparation anxa lysis is key you have them exhale above three seconds prior to that there's a lot of change to how we're doing this people who are introducing radial access

power injection anywhere from about 50 to even sometimes thirty to a hundred percent contrast depends on what phase you're imaging we have a Animoto power injector that allows us to slide what contrast concentration we like a lot of

times people just rely on 30% and do their whole the case with that some people do a hundred percent image quality this is what it looks like when someone's breathing this is very difficult to tell if there's complete

lesion enhancement so if you do your comb beam CT know it looks like this this is trying to coach the patient and try to get them to hold still and then this is the patient after coaching which looks like this so you can tell that you

have a missing portion of the lesion and you have to treat into another segment what about when you're doing an angio and you do a cone beam CT NIT looks like this this is what insufficient counts looks like on comb beam so when you see

these sort of Shell station lines that are going all over the screen you have to raise dose usually in larger patients but this is you know you either slow down the acquisition speed of your comb beam or

you raise dose this is what it looks like after we gave it a higher dose protocol it really changes everything those lines are still there but they're much smaller how do you know if you have enhancement or a narrow artifact you can

repeat with non-contrast CT and give the patient glucagon and you can find the small very these small arteries that pick off the left that commonly profuse the stomach the right gastric artery you can use your comb beam CT to find

non-target evaluation even when your angio doesn't suggest it so this is a patient they have recurrent HCC we didn't angio from here those arteries down there where those coils were looked funny even though the patient was

quote-unquote coiled off we did a comb beam CT and that little squiggly C shape structures that duodenum that's contrast going in it this would be probably a lethal event for the patient or certainly would require surgery if you

treated that much with y9t reposition the catheter deeper towards the lesion and you can repeat your comb beam CT and see that you don't have an hands minh sometimes you have these little accessory left gastric artery this is

where we really need your help you know a lot of times everyone's focused and I think the more eyes the better for these kind of things but we're looking for these little tiny vessels that sometimes hop out of the liver and back into the

stomach or up into the esophagus there's a very very small right gastric artery in this picture here this patient post hepatectomy that rides along the inferior surface of the liver it's a little curly cube so and this is a small

esophageal branch so when you do comb beam TT this is what the stomach looks like when it enhances and this is what the esophagus looks like when it enhances you can do non contrast comb beam CTS to confirm ablation so you have

a lesion this is the comb beam CT for enhancement you treat with your embolic and this is a post to determine that you've had completely shin coverage and you can see how that correlates a response so the last thing we're going

to talk about is indirect angiography this is kind of a neat trick to suggest to your intervention list as a problem solver we were asked to ablate this lesion and it looked kind of funny this patient had a resection for HCC they

thought this was a recurrence so we bring the comb beam CT and we do an angio and it doesn't enhance so this is an image here of indirect port ography so what you can do is an SMA run and see at which point along the

run do you pacify the portal vein and you just set up your cone beam CT for that time so you just repeat your injection and now your pacifying the entire portal vein even though you haven't selected it and what to show

well this was a portal aneurysm after resection with a little bit of clot in it the patient went on some aspirin and it resolved in three months so back to our first patient what do you do for someone who has HCC that's invading the

heart this patient underwent 2y 90s bland embolization microwave ablation chemotherapy and SBRT and he's an eight-year survivor so it's one of those things where certainly with the correct patient selection you can find the right

things to do for someone I think that usually our best results come from our interdisciplinary consensus in terms of trying to use the unique advantages that individual therapies have and IO is just one of those but this is an important

lesson to our whole group that you know a lot of times you get your best results when you use things like a team approach so in summary there are applications to IO prior to surgery to make people surgical candidates there are definitive

treatments ie your cancer will be treated definitively with curative intent a lot of times we can save when people have tried cure intent and weren't able to and obviously to palliate folks to try to buy them time

and quality of life thermal ablation is safe and effective for small lesions but it's limited by the adjacent anatomy y9t is not an ischemic therapy it's an ablative therapy you're putting small ablative radioactive particles within

the lesion and just using the blood supply as a conduit for your brachytherapy and you can use this as a new admin application to make people safer surgical candidates when you apply to the entire ride a panic globe

thanks everyone appreciate it [Applause] [Music]

them so my particular area of interest is a blade of radium ization and what we'd like to do is to break the liver

down into a bunch of little tiny perfused volumes off of a single vascular pedicle or what we call angio zones and those are those allow us to segment out if you only have small volume disease for example like here in

segment three why do I have to treat the entire left to paddock low I can actually treat just that small portion just like it what it tastes only now I'm administering y9t but since it's expendable liver I

can administer doses that are way higher orders of magnitudes higher than what I could if our infusing into the liver just on its own so here's an example of that if you look at this lesion in the right of panic lobe you'll see these

little lines over them what we want to achieve is around a 205 GRA threshold for these lesions that's the red line everything that's south of red in terms of color orange Holly to blue is not cold enough to kill tumor so if we

administer a dose of a tea grade to the lobe we get this coverage which is to be a partial response if I administer 150 grey suddenly that red line gets larger what happens when you administer 400 grey now you've officially covered the

entire lesion and so you're going to lose the adjacent liver at those kind of doses and as well - what what the real question then is not sort of how much dose you give it's you give what you need to to ablate the tumor in its

entirety and you see what the patient's left with if someone's left with anatomically a lot of remnant liver because of how you've segmented out that lesion then go ahead and dose extremely high and that's essentially what we've

seen in pathologic results it's one of the highest things of high school pathological crosa rates you can achieve with a trans arterial therapy it's highly competitive with thermal ablation in the correctly selected bleezin

so this is an example of what it looks like when you segment out a little lesion like this and this patient ultimately went to resection and this was a complete pathologic necrosis but as you can see even it was a cirrhotic

patient we chose a very small volume of liver that we felt the patient would tolerate so that's a blade of vernalization let's take a look at what looks like in real time so we have a little capsular lesion we felt that

ablating this patient who was a potential transplant candidate we felt we can probably with a blade of radium realization so you go in and this is the comb beam CT that looks at a complete enhancement of the lesion within the NGO

zone this is what the MAA looks like when we administer it you can see how it tends to cluster within the tumor but you can see what the adverse territory is the liver adjacent to it this is what the engine room looks like how highly

selective it is the day of and this is what the wine ID actually looks like is the wine 90 doing its job and you can see how conformal it is there's no risk whatsoever to the liver that's adjacent outside of that field of

a maximum of around 11 millimeters and this is a patient at one month with a complete imaging response and this patient never developed a recurrent to the site and what's actually sole mode of treatment for this person's liver

cancer this is how you get complete pathologic response if you look at those little tiny grey dots in there those are actually the spheres within tiny little vessels within the tumor sometimes they go even to the portal branch but you can

see how they're not clustered uniformly but when you make them super hot that allows them to give range where otherwise they would be fine a little bit short so this also applies to the whole lobe this was a patient that had a

very unusual presentation of colon cancer that was invading the portal II we weren't sure what to do with this patient no one was because a very rare occurrence so we said well we would like

to resect him but there's not enough liver and we're not sure if this person's gonna survive because we've never seen portal cancer invading the portal vein so we said let's treat it with the radiation lobectomy and what's

cool here is if you look at the the arteries even though the tumor is invading the portal vein it's bringing arterial supply along with it like a vagabond and that's the conduit that allows us to treat these patients so

when we saw that we felt this patient we good candidate for irradiation lobectomy which is applying an ablative dose of y9t to the entire low not just a small segment in patients where otherwise cannot because of the anatomy the tumor

or if you're trying to shrink that lobe to get that person ready for surgery why because if you look at the size of the lobe on the left from this first image and compare it here you can see how much larger it got what happens is that part

that the surgeon ultimately tens on resecting in volutes over time and becomes completely vitalized and turns into scar tissue so we know that if a surgeon goes in afterwards to cut it out it's going to not result in liver

failure and that level of security allows people to have sir who otherwise wouldn't this patient is not going to have metastatic disease because we followed their blood level markers let me see how low they are and

is going to have enough liver remnant so the patient went to resection and this is the pathologic specimen and this was also a complete pathologic necrosis so I

so why staging important well when you go to treat someone if I tell you I have a lollipop shaped tumor and you make a lollipop shape ablation zone over it you have to make sure that it's actually a lollipop shaped to begin with so here's

a patient I was asked to ablate at the bottom corner we had a CT scan that showed pretty nice to confined lesion looked a little regular so we got an MRI the MRI shows that white signal that's around there then hyperintensity that's

abnormal and so when we did an angiogram you can see that this is an infiltrate of hepatocellular carcinoma so had I done an ablation right over that center-of-mass consistent with what we saw on the CT it

wouldn't be an ablation failure the blasian was doing its job we just wouldn't have applied it to where the tumor actually was so let's talk about

the ablation concept in general is to provide an environment that is

completely hostile to tumor minus 40 degrees Celsius 150 degrees Celsius 500 gray which is a radiation dose we say it's very hard for it's about anything to survive but so why is it that it doesn't always work well that's a

function of all those parameters that you see there we got to make sure we pick the right patients we got to make sure that we treat tumor where we think it is and avoid trading things that don't need treatment avoid causing

damage to collateral structures and getting a reasonable margin where we actually get some of the tumor that's microscopic there are a lot of ablation modalities radiofrequency alternates electrical current very rapidly so that

generates friction within the lesion and causes heat it looks like this a lot of times you see these little times that stick out so that you can increase the size of your blasian zone and here's a one of those deployed in a patient who

had a colorectal Curren after hepatectomy cryoablation freezes things and it pushes a gas that once it goes through a pin hole tends to expand and cause rapid freezing he can also push another gas right through it and cause

rapid heating but this is just bringing tumors to that minus 20 degree minus 40 degree threshold the nice part about cryoablation is that you can visualize your ablation zone so we're right up against the bile duct here and it tends

to be a little more respectful of tissues so that's why cryoablation is chosen every once in a while we're do frequency ablation is an excellent tool we have lots of data for it but likes it sometimes it's difficult determine where

the ablation zone is interprocedural e microwave ablation there was just a randomized study that came out that compared microwave ablation to radiofrequency ablation and the results are very similar

it was a very very experienced institution doing it but the whole point here is that a lot of these tools work pretty well there's no clear superiority on them but one thing that microwave offers it's very fast so generates

temperatures to boiling within the tumor in about five minutes and so it's certainly very fast as compared to radiofrequency and you can see boiling happening within this tumor that's been accessed eventually there that gas is

actually literally fluid that is boiling away from the tumor couple of cool ones this one's reversal expiration what we do here is we place probes throughout the lesion and we pulse it to confuse the membrane on the cell to think that

it's a it has holes in it that it cannot close and so what is happening is the contents inside the cell leave and that's pretty much consistent with not being able to survive the nice part is we can accomplish all that without

thermal ablation what do we mean that we don't go over about 40 degrees Celsius so if something is involving a bile duct or involving a critical structure like the ureter it's not actually going to damage it it just basically tells all

the the cells within there to stop stop undergoing the cellular mechanisms responsible for life it's a little more finicky to place you have to place these little parallel probes here's one we did that was directly write on the

bifurcation of the main bile ducts and you can see here afterwards is an immediate post contrast scan how that whole area is ablative it does not take up contrast and this patient never developed biliary strictures that side

includes an interview of the patient abnormalities of major organ systems like cardiac status do they have a reduced ejection fraction do they have coronary artery disease I want to know

if they have an EF of 10% because if they become hemodynamically unstable and I want to give them fluids I'm not going to bolus a patient with a very low ejection fraction with two liters of fluid you're gonna cause

pulmonary edema and you're going to worsen the situation renal status is huge a lot of our patients are renal e impaired and that can affect the way that they clear the sedation medications that we're giving pulmonary status do

they have COPD asthma or sleep apnea sleep apnea is major in procedural sedation neurologic status do they have a history of seizures endocrine status hyper or hypo metabolism of medications can occur if they have a thyroid

disorder we want to know about adverse experiences with sedation in the past do they have a history of a difficult airway for us at NYU if they have been already been identified as a difficult airway that automatically means we're

doing the procedure with anesthesia current medications potential drug interactions is very important we'll go over that a few slides drug allergies and herbal supplements that they're taking tobacco alcohol or

substance use and frequent or repeated exposure to sedation agents is just going to increase their tolerance of the medications physical exam vital signs auscultation of heart and lungs and then their airway assessment sorry excuse me

do they have any Strider snoring or sleep apnea advanced RA they're gonna have a hard time tilting their neck back if they have cervical spine disease or they have rheumatoid arthritis chromosomal abnormalities like

trisomy 21 patients with Down syndrome can have an enlarged tongue that can impair your ability to manually ventilate them if respiratory depression wants to occur body habitus if they have significant obesity especially of the

head and neck areas and head and neck limited neck extension short neck decreased ornamental distance which is basically just looking at how far back they can tilt their head any neck mass and then again cervical spine disease or

trauma do they have a c-spine collar are they on c-spine precautions that's not a patient we're going to be able to manipulate their airway and then mouth opening we do use Mallampati and I'll review

that in a couple of slides so the AFC classification is a categorization of the patient's physiologic status that can be helpful in predicting operative risk it is recommended by the AFA that if a patient is an Asaf or that that

should prompt an evaluation by an anesthesiologist I will tell you at NYU we will still get procedural sedation to some patients who are in Asaf or but we like to identify it ahead of time because if they have significant

comorbidities that will potentially increase their likely hurt likelihood of having an adverse outcome we then have a lower threshold for activating a rapid response or a code if something was to happen if we got concerned about

something so the airway assessment is

do we care about carotid occlusive disease why is it such a big deal stroke is a major factor obviously stroke is the third leading cause of death 750-thousand approaching a million

strokes a year and it's a leading cause even if you survive the stroke of disability majority of these are ischemic and not bleeding or hemorrhagic strokes and a lot of them a significant number of the ischemic strokes reside or

source from carotid disease so the carotid is the issue in those patients and the stroke risk in those patients is as ultimately related to the degree of stenosis that they have or narrowing that they have at the carotid and do

they have any history of neurologic symptoms that determines if they're symptomatic or asymptomatic so you could have a critically narrowed lesion but have zero symptoms that's asymptomatic and you can have a

less significant so no --ss not 99% but say 70% but you have some symptoms you're getting blindness intermittently or or intermittent numbness in your hands and that's symptomatic right and with

that that's a much more worrisome sign in the setting of that even though milder stenosis so what is the you know the importance of this is for us to be able to to determine which patients who we would be treating or not so we're all

we know try to make this painless but I think it's kind of interesting

so metabolism is just talking about converting a medication into a less or more active form and that gets converted into what we call metabolites within metabolism you have your cytochrome p450 system which is responsible for

metabolism of a lot of the drugs that we give and essentially that's just a family of enzymes that are responsible for metabolism properties are going of the drug are going to influence the duration of action and the half-life of

your medication so for instance of a pee if a drug is highly protein bound what it does when you administer it is it binds to the protein molecules and slowly dissociates so you have a longer duration of action

because when it's bound to the protein it's in active half-life again any properties that increase the duration of action are going to be something we want to pay attention to and how is the drug excreted you can have excretion through

the bile feces renal system a big thing I think for us and IR is drugs that are really excreted benzodiazepines are the mainstay in providing the sedative component a procedural sedation it's going to enhance the inhibitory effect

of the gaba neurotransmitter in the central nervous system why do we care about that does anyone know have something to do with our reversal so our gaba neurotransmitter is responsible for inhibiting the activity

in the brain so if we didn't have a gaba neurotransmitter we would have seizures all day patients who have seizure history of seizure disorder are sometimes on benzodiazepine therapy at home if you sedate them and they require

reversal and you give them flemeth know you can potentially precipitate a seizure so it's just something you want to keep in the back of your mind it doesn't mean you're not going to reverse them you just want to be prepared to

handle a seizure if that occurs versed is our number one drug that we use onset of action and peak effect or seen in 3 to 5 minutes the antagonist as I mentioned is flumazenil and the half-life is three

hours typically in our department we give one milligram depending on the patient's physical condition and what they require and how anxious they are we may give 0.5 or up to two in one dose now you're gonna see and an Aaron says

this to in their procedural sedation guideline that you shouldn't exceed five milligrams I don't complete and that means overall in one case I don't completely agree with that I'll explain more why later but I think patients are

really complex and there can be a lot of drug interactions that are occurring that may cause them to require more sedation than a typical patient so it's not so cut and dry you could look at five milligrams and go that's kind of

more than the norm and maybe I need to look at is the sedation not working but you may have a patient that could take 10 11 12 milligrams of versed and be

timing of a minute administration is that you need to know the drugs time of onset peak response and duration of action and titration of drug to effect is an important concept so you need to know whether the drug you just gave hit

its peak effect before you start Rideau seing them that concept is called Li and C to peak drug effect and all that's saying is that you just want to make sure that you're hitting the peak effect before you redose if you don't you can

have dose stacking which can put the patient at risk for toxicity and latency to peak drug effects can be changed by the physical physical chemical properties like we just discussed so how much it provides to protein is it lipid

soluble it's basically talking about how quickly it can get to the site of action and do what it needs to do pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability is basically just telling you that I could give one person a

milligram of versed and then give the next patient a mil a milligram of versed and they can have completely different responses and some things we can predict ahead of time and other things are we're just not going to know I mentioned the

cytochrome p450 system there are patients that have genetic variances of those enzymes that can change the way they metabolize the drug there's no way that we're going to know that beforehand the way that you deal with this or

tackle this problem is you start small assess and adjust we all know this you learn this in nursing school it's easy to add more it's always going to be worse to try to take it back you won't be able to take it back

I like this chart just because it kind of talks about the different variables that you may encounter so we already talked about the pharmacokinetic variabilities but some of the pharmacodynamic variabilities are going

to be your drug receptor status genetic factors drug interactions and tolerance when I look at drug receptor status I'm thinking methadone buprenorphine if you have a patient on buprenorphine and that receptor is occupied by the

buprenorphine it's going to cause competition for the next opioid you try to give like fentanyl we've had some problems patience in our department with this drug as far as titration is concerned

you want to administer each component individually to achieve the desired effect now this was a change for us when I first started talking about this because we used to give versed and fentanyl together every single time but

with the AFA recommends is that you give the drugs individually monitor the response and then assess accordingly this is an algorithm I found on up-to-date it's just a suggestion obviously it's not going to fit every

patient but it's just describing how you would start out with midazolam first give that time to hit the peak effect which again remember is gonna be 3 to 5 minutes and that can feel like a long time NIR so it's a little painful to do

this but it is going to I think lead to a better outcome for you and for the patient as far as their experience then if necessary give fentanyl I usually give that for the access because really I think for the most part most of the

things we do aren't overtly painful there may be painful parts of the procedure but it's not just two hours of pain or it shouldn't be and then you want to observe the patient if you gave fentanyl you really want to wait five

minutes and then redose from there so usually I just give the one dose of fentanyl and then I stick with my versed by eliminating that that double dose every time you're going to be able to go higher on your versed or your fentanyl

depending on what you need to give so that makes sense to everybody we were we were giving we call it one round versed in fentanyl one round and then by the fourth round nurses were understandably going oh good I the

patient needs more but I feel really uncomfortable and a CRNA said to me one day why are you guys giving fentanyl and versed every time it's great for the synergistic effect but you're going to hit that feeling a lot faster than if

you just give small incremental doses of versed to get them through the procedure and leading into synergistic interactions so giving a benzodiazepine and opioid together elicits a synergistic interaction you can think of

it as 1/2 plus 1/2 equals 4 in the city and that's a lot of what we were seeing we were seeing this you know give the fence alone verse said okay they're really sedated and then they're not anymore and then they're really

sedated and then they're not anymore versus this really nice steady maintenance of sedation during the procedure intra procedure you want to be

fine versed is extensively metabolized by the liver so I mentioned the Cy p450

systems so the specific enzyme that metabolizes versed cyp3a4 now that sounds like way too much information but what's important about that is there are some drugs that are also metabolized by the same enzyme that are inhibitors of

this enzyme and one of them is verapamil so at my institution when you order verapamil and versed together a warning comes up that's telling you that the verapamil may potentiate the effect of the versed and that's because the

verapamil is inhibiting the metabolism of the versed which means it's sticking around longer it's a consideration because we give wrap a mill for our radial access cases for a Vizsla spasm prophylaxis and neural patients yes yeah

a lot of neural patients for a cerebral vasospasm properties it's 97 percent protein bound so that means if you have a patient who has low serum albumin you may see a more potent effect right away because they don't have as an

a lot of protein circulating so that drug won't have protein to bind to half life in patients with renal failure reduced elimination of an act of the active metabolite can cause drug accumulation and prolonged sedation and

I'll tell you why that's especially important in the next couple of slides and then considerations prolonged tap life and the elderly obese and reduce hepatic and kidney function I think most of us know this but I think it kind of

helps to drive at home if you know why why is it prolonged half life in reduced kidney function well it's because it's 97% protein bound and it needs to be excreted by the kidney and you have an active metabolite circulating around not

getting cleared opioids are the mainstay

no thanks to the avir we really wouldn't be able to do anything that we can without y'all so I take great great pride in sharing things from our perspective said you folks can start contributing your own thoughts your own opinions and your own vision during

these cases I think it's certainly something that I've appreciated since the first day of doing invention where do you all do so having said that we're just a smidge in the behind side so we'll try to focus today is mainly a

survey to stimulate everyone in terms of what's actually happening on the other end of the catheter with respect to the patient why are we doing these things where's our role and I think that's gonna add hopefully some value the next

time you folks step in on one of these cases alright so as you know dr. daughter first was able to visualize the inside of a blood vessel and find a stenosis and a lady who had limb ischemia and then was able to use a

dilator to fix that so obviously that gave birth to interventional radiology so we started taking pictures of tumors just to diagnose tumors back in the day before we had actual imaging and what we found

was well if tumors have a high demand for blood just like anything else what happens if we take away that blood and this is a 1975 image of renal cell carcinoma is to call them hyper and if Roma's back then but basically the

concept of interventional ecology was born the moment you could do something to make the environment for the tumor less hospitable and to try to palliate patients if they weren't subject to the the gold treatment standards like

resection in this case so fast forward to 2016 there was a huge study was International where they looked at over 3 000 patients who have primary liver cancer or her pata cellular carcinoma and what they found was that regardless

of where but if you sum all the treatment decisions that are related to those patients about 70% will see treatment by an interventional radiologist as you know that was a astounding amount

so si are listened to a lot of these types of messages even outside of obviously oncology basically we realize that there's a tremendous responsibility and the best thing to do is to dedicate ourselves fully to that and that's why I

think with IR now is a separate medical specialty we're going to start seeing more of the clinical involvement of this and certainly think the caseloads going to go up so why interventional oncology

interesting to grapefruit if a few YP three a-four inhibitor so I always remembered from nursing school they said

don't give grapefruit but I never really knew why but that's why it's just inhibiting the enzyme that's required for metabolism flumazenil is the reversal agent for benzodiazepines your initial dose is going to be 0.2

milligrams over 15 seconds what's important to note about flumazenil other than the seizures that I mentioned before is that the half-life is shorter for flumazenil than it is for versed so you can see a recitation effect which is

why you really need to monitor them for a good period of time after you're giving it and monitor to make sure they don't become reefa dated we're all familiar with narcan it's the reversal agents for opioid medications the

initial dose is 0.4 milligrams given over 30 seconds and you can repeat every one to three minutes to a maximum of ten milligrams other medications I think are useful to mention because you do see them and I are usually given by an

anesthesiologist propofol is a great drug onset of action is less than one minute but it's a potent drug so you can see significant hypotension and respiratory depression for us in New York it's not permitted for use by non

anesthesiologists Dex Mehta Tommy Dean is another interesting drug that's sort of getting into the kind of talk in the IR world so in the 2018 guidelines that I mentioned before they address sex medicine

and they said that it could be an alternative for versed in particular cases it's a highly selective centrally acting alpha-2 agonist with eggsy oolitic sedative and some analgesic effects

you usually administer it as a bolus over 10 minutes and then you start a continuous infusion however some of the very potent bradycardia that you can see can be mitigated by eliminating the bolus infusion or the bolus

administration rather and significant considerations with this are hypotension and bradycardia does anyone use pres iudex in their ir suite oh you do okay you guys give it cool we'll talk our our anesthesiologists are

a little territorial with it however the research does show that it does have a better safety profile in certain patients so it you know yeah so that's my experience with it but our particular anesthesiologist that oversees our

sedation committee and all of our sedation practices is concerned about us using in an ir because not all the practitioners have experience administering it there's not a reversal so if the patient became bradycardic you

would have to treat their bradycardia with fluids or atropine or other medications for your particular institution yeah right it yes yes always look at your state guidelines yes so the a what the a sa says about the

all about effective bag-valve-mask it's the mainstay of airway management and procedural sedation but also in the o.r so you're gonna see if you're ever working with an anesthesiologist that

the first thing they want to see is how easily they can ventilate the patient with a mask and if they have trouble they know that's potentially going to be a patient that may give them difficulty later on when they're attempting to

intubate because when they go to intubate the patient if they're not successful they immediately stop and go back to bagging the patient they want to know that that's gonna be there their failsafe and that they have an

effective way of delivering breaths the difficult airway is going to be defined in terms of whether effective gas exchange can take place with an Ambu bag so at NYU we use the sorry we use the Mallampati so this classification system

attempts to grade the degree of airway difficulty the foundation of the assessment is that the tongue is the largest anatomical structure that can inhibit mask ventilation now again if you look at the research surrounding

this Mallampati used in isolation it's not useful you really want to look at all of the other airway assessment criteria that I just previously discussed because it's on our required documentation you know it can be

something that maybe providers get focused on just open your mouth cool and move on but it really is important to look at all the other components not to call out my attending sitting over there so this is a great mnemonic that I like

moans it's just a quick easy way to identify a patient that may give you a little bit of trouble when it comes to manual ventilation so M is for mask o for OB 3a for age and for no teeth and s for stiff lungs so you can see with this

patient here with the beard he has a lot of facial hair so that's a patient that you're gonna have a difficulty getting a good seal with and if you can see they actually covered his beard with Tegaderm in order to get an effective seal right

painful later but great for his airway um last thing yes at this point oh great this points you guys can still hear me okay so for this patient for for obese patients in general my biggest pain point I guess you could say is when I

see patients inappropriately position during procedural sedation and a nurse will call and say the patient's not really well sedated but his his capnography waveform looks all off he's occasionally having periods of apnea can

you come and help and the patient looks like this so a patient who's sedated is not going to be able to comfortably spontaneously mentally win their position like that you can see his airway is a little bit compressed here

he has to overcome extra body habitus in order to effectively take a breath so what you want to do is just ramp your patient and this is obviously extreme like if you're doing an angiogram you're not the providers gonna say what on

earth are you doing but what you can do is take that pillow out and put a little roll underneath the shoulders and you're gonna see the airway open up and if I get patients who come in and they can't be flat maybe they have congestive heart

failure so they have that pillow orthopnea you can position them like this give them the sedation and then take everything out that's what I always do you you want to make sure that you have

good positioning and that's going to set you up for success patients who are elderly or have no teeth are going to be what we call a dentist and they essentially just have loss of musculature in the face which is going

to correlate with surface area which means you're not gonna be able to get a good seal so what they did in this particular patient is they actually put gauze in to just increase that surface area and then patients with stiff lungs

are going to be patients who have a history of COPD or any other restrictive lung disease and they just may be difficult to ventilate Pharmacology and

are there any questions yeah yes that's a really good sure so the question was do you have any rules or guidelines in my institution about how long the procedure can be before you start

talking about anesthesia versus sedation is that right and positioning prone supine we did come up with a guideline with within our department we looked at a little bit of research but honestly was more expert opinion just best

practice and experience I in in general I would say if the procedure is 3 plus hours the patient should know they're going to be on the table not asleep for three plus hours and talk to them about what that means and if they're ok with

that I just think again that comes into setting realistic expectations that's one of the reasons actually that we're very interested in using Dex med otama Dean because that's going to be a better

drug for those longer procedures first was giving functional and versed for four hours it's just not it's not appropriate but you know and some people would say we'll just get an anesthesiologist them but a lot of these

patients are really thick so in our institution anesthesia is just really super regulated and they require all of these clearances for their involvement no matter what they're giving sometimes they'll require all these clearances and

they give exactly what we were going to give so you know it's it's really a juggling act I would say in our department we really just make sure the patient knows what the expectation is and then we'll usually say to the

provider to if if something goes like if anything looks a little concerning during the case we're stopping and they have to be ok with that and they are they really are but that took a lot of work to get everybody on board with that

type of communication yeah we don't know so they I know I think Sloane is anyone here from Sloane no I think Sloane has with dedicated anesthesiologists they work really closely with them and it's easier for

them to get cases scheduled they will give us they will assign us an anesthesiologist for the day but if we don't have any anesthesia cases they get reassigned somewhere in the o.r and it's a different analysis every time it tends

to be the same group some are stricter than others some will have a patient say I really want anesthesia and we can call up the provider and there they say no problem let me do a quick chart review whereas the next day the provider goes

no absolutely not send them for clearances that's a little tricky yeah right so what I showed you is from the american society of anesthesiology i am not affiliated with them at all i just think they bide non anesthesiologist

sedation so i rely heavily on what they say and they recommend waiting till peak effects so i would look at the pharmacokinetics so for versed it's 3 to 5 minutes so i would wait at least 3 minutes before your readmit a stirring I

think a good example with that is when diazepam with the sedative of choice the on the peak effect for diazepam is 1 minute so when midazolam came onto the market there were a lot of adverse outcomes

with patients because providers administering it weren't familiar with the pharmacokinetics and assumed that the peak effect for versed was the same for diazepam so in theory you could give a patient in 5 minutes 5 milligrams of

versed so by the time that fully hits them they could be in a negative 5 on your raft scale so you know just look at those pharmacokinetics look at that peak effect and I would use that to drive your dosing scheme Atlee that's what I

do and I think since we've done that we've seen better meet info cities and better safety outcomes yes okay yeah we don't do that we do one thing with uterine fibroid embolization swear they'll do a superior mesenteric block

but otherwise we don't do any other type of regional blocks but I have read about that I think that's really are the IR providers giving the block okay right I've seen two with uterine fibroid embolization we'll do an epidural in

advance some I think some institutions or some literature exists about that it's interesting it would be interesting if the IR providers could actually give it though I'm not sure if that's kosher in the anesthesia world but they're

certainly qualified to do it they they do already kind of do it really but so I mean that's certainly something interesting and if you have a provider that is comfortable taking that on and their institution I think it's worth

looking at because anything that's sort of I think mixes things up and and provides a different Avenue especially for high-risk patients is worth looking into definitely yes I believe it yeah

mm-hm right so I'll just repeat what she said so just jumping on the talk about blocks so in her institution they the providers to administer blocks and I think you said

coleus estas Tamizh and PTC's and biliary dream placements they'll use that and it will decrease the amount of sedation that's required sedation being versed and fentanyl that's required during the case which like yes like you

said is really great for patients who are already on opioids previously and habit aller ins yes [Music] something right so we again he left same provider though had a patient on Groupon

or Fein and it was our first experience within about a year ago and it was terrible and she did not have realistic expectations going in of how sedated she would be and she was very very unhappy

afterwards so we talked a lot about that and in that guideline I had mentioned that we made about when we involve anesthesia and when we don't there's a caveat about that that says that if a patient is on

methadone or buprenorphine that a discussion needs to take place making them aware that they will probably not feel very sedated but we will try our best and if they're not comfortable with that we reschedule the procedure with

anesthesia but they have to know going into it that they they may not feel completely sedated and we just keep that open and honest communication but we haven't really come up with a scheme of what's best we did actually try with her

we had her come in one day having taken her buprenorphine the day of the procedure and she seemed okay with that and then we tried having her go off of it so that the receptors wouldn't be blocked she was not happy with that

experience so that's really when a person like that probably would do great with propofol but we can't give propofol so you know if the and if the patient tells us no then we just reschedule with the anesthesia

right - hmm right right right you could at least if they're if they're on an opioid uh if they're on people nor Fein then in theory they should respond to the verse said you could go heavier hand it on the

versed just to get them sedated but they will probably still feel pain but it they hopefully won't remember it that's true I you know with the Richmond agitation sedation scale that's not going to fit every patient that's a

really good point I gave a patient seven of versed during an adrenal vein sampling and she was just talking my ear off I got I fed are you okay you know do you need me to give you anything else no no I'm good I'm good and then I wheeled

her out we got her in the recovery area and she goes sit over I said yeah she said wow I don't I don't remember anything the power of her said that that was like a true and music effect I hadn't seen that so strongly in a

patient before but if you if I had done you know I was documenting that she was a zero it looked like I wasn't doing much for her but then I was putting comments you know patient comfortable denying needing any more sedation so

won't fit every patient so it is good to look at that but yeah as far as the buprenorphine I mean it's it's it's tough yeah if they have an addiction specialist I would say talk to them and they might be

able to come up with a scheme that works for them and if there's a lot of pain expected afterwards those patients are gonna have to be on parenteral opioid therapy they'll probably have to stay you know if you're in a hospital they

would have to stay overnight so those are all things you have to consider yeah yes hmm yeah I'm like it so Adam and Alexa are nurse practitioners that we work with and I'm looking at Adam because

this is actually was a very hot topic for us in the last six months so we actually cheat we met with our sedation committee that's run by that in a physiologist who's blocking us from using pres of X and discuss with him

that in the protocol that guides our practice it's said that you did the timeout and then gave sedation but Ari anesthesiologists don't do that right so they intubate the patient and everything and then and they and then the provider

comes in and does the timeout right before the puncture or incision so we talked about to him about how well if we're gonna do the latency to peak effect it's not enough time right so we do now bring the patient in and start

sedation right away our orders are put in in advance I know some by the attending or the Li P so we have a PRN dose and with an a certain number of occurrences and a titrate to a certain Ross scale

yes yeah so and that our anesthesiologist mentions that our providers are present but it's it's a certain use of the language I think it might be like direct observation or immediately available and our providers

are immediately available it's up to your hospital so our profit our providers aren't like down the street on their way in to work with coffee and street clothes and we're sedating they're they're just down the hall maybe

or the way our department looks is we have a control area and it's like the you know the Central Station and you can see all of the rooms so they might be in the Central Station but just haven't gone in to do the time out yet that

being said I always talk to them before I bring the patient in and say what's the goal Rath and I address any concerns that I have and I think people think I'm a little kooky when I do that for every case but it I think it works really well

and I think the providers really like it so we just already start from the Gecko our line of communication I tell them the patient seems really anxious this is my plan what do you think agree disagree yes the procedural if does the procedure

list or the Lak but I've sedated the patient so the patient if you look at what Jayco describes in the universal protocol it's ideal if they can participate in the timeout however not required because then when they do the

timeout they're right there stabbing them with lidocaine so I like to you know I mean I would argue that by starting I would argue about that by starting at the sedation earlier and getting the patient into a comfortable

state you're more safe because you're doing the dosing appropriately according to the a sa yeah correct right right right

okay I think it's important to say though it's not about getting around Joint Commission this is what Joint Commission says you may feel uncomfortable with it and that's okay

but it is what our accrediting body says is okay we're also not intimating the patient and paralyzing them like an Asst the anesthesiologist is now having said that it's not like we walk the patient in and we go oh I think you're mr. Jones

we throw you on the table there is an initial timeout that's done with the nurse and the technologist and the other people in the room shaking his head yes as so the acceptable amount of time after reversal

yes so if it happens if it happens mid procedure you need to it's I believe the language the a sa uses that you have to have a discussion amongst the care team about whether or not you're going to proceed if it happens after the

procedure in the recovery area or it happens mid procedure and you abort then it has to be at least two hours before you discharge that patient or move them back to their unit where they came from because of that recitation effect and

because you can have really adverse effects from sedation like flumazenil can cause serious delirium I had a patient like that one time it was it was awful and it can cause serious cardiac arrhythmia so at least two hours if you

continue with the procedure I would just make sure everyone knows that you have to be really careful with recitation effects and and all of the adverse effects that you'd be looking at yes I think one more question I'm sorry

with hyperkalemia I have come across I want to say it was in perioperative guidelines when I was looking at the labs that we do cuz we do a lot of unnecessary labs in our department you guys might - I feel like we just really

overdo it I believe the perioperative recommendations are to check a serum potassium if the patient has a reason to have hyperkalemia however right if their hyperkalemic and

they develop a cardiac arrhythmia you know could hypoxia also precipitate that cardiac arrhythmia the results from the hyperkalemia maybe I just went in I wouldn't take an ounce

I would I would consider hyperkalemia severe hyperkalemia and unstable patient because that patient could go into a fatal arrhythmia so I would correct that before you bring them into an elective Percy what's often an elective procedure

so if you're doing a fistula gram you know right five point yeah why are we will go up to five point eight we personally will go up to five point eight because a lot of times they're hyperkalemic

because they're fish too less clothes now and we need to open it right so just again it I don't think there's ever going to be any hard and fast data that you see it's all about making sure everyone knows this patient has a serum

potassium of five point eight we're going to be really closely watching the ECG monitoring yeah thank you everyone thank you so much [Applause]

quick I did want to mention t-carr briefly and try to get you guys closer to back on time this is a hybrid procedure this is combining the surgical procedure we talked about first and carotid stenting it takes combined

carotid exposure at the base of the clavicle or just above the clavicle and reverses blood flow just like we talked about but tastes slightly different technique or approach to doing this and then you put the stent in from a drug

carotid access here's the components of the device right up by the neck there is where the incision is made just above the clavicle and you have this sheet that's about eight French in size that only goes in about us to 2 cm or 1 and a

half cm overall into the vessel and then that sheath is sutured to the the chest wall and then it's got a side arm that goes what's labeled number six here is this flow reversal urn enroute neuroprotection kit it reverses the

blood flow and then you get a femoral sheath in the vein right in the common femoral vein and you reverse the blood flow so this is a case a picture from our institution up on the right is the patient's neck and that's the carotid

exposure and the initial sheath is in place so the sidearm of that sheath is the enroute protection system which is going up up at the top of the image there we're gonna back bleed that let that sidearm of that sheath continue to

bleed up to the very top and then connect that to the common femoral venous sheet that we have in place there's a stepwise of that and then ultimately what we see at the end of the procedure is that filter inside that

little canister can be interrogated after and you can see the debris this is in the box D here on the bottom left the debris that we captured during the flow reversal and this is a what we call a passive and then active flow reversal

system so once the system is in place the direct exposure carotid sheath in place the flow controller and AV shunt in place you see the direction of blood flow so now all that blood flow in that common carotid artery is going reverse

direction and so when you place a sheath or wire and and ultimately through that sheath up by the carotid artery there's no risk for distal embolization because everything is flowing in Reverse here's a couple

case examples ferns from our institution this is a patient who had a symptomatic critical greater than 90% stenosis has tandems to nose he's so one proximal at the origin and one a little bit more distal we you can see the little

retractors down at the base of the image there in the sheath that's essentially the extent of the sheath from the bottom of that image into the vessel only about a cm or two post angioplasty instant patient tolerated that quite well here's

another 71 year-old asymptomatic patient greater than 90% stenosis pretty calcified lesion a little more extensive than maybe with the CT shows there's the angiography and then ultimately a post stent placement using the embolic

protection device and overall the trials have shown good good safety met profile overall compared to carotid surgery so it's a minimum minimal exposure not nearly as large the risk of stroke is less because you're not mucking around

up there you're using the best of a low profile system with flow reversal albeit with a mini surgical exposure overall we've actually have an abstract or post trip this year's meeting this is just a snapshot of that you can check it out

this is our one year experience we've had comparable low complication rates overall in our experience so in summary

So question. I do have a wonderful group of nurses, an excellent group that I get the chance to work with

and they have asked 100 questions and they've listened to me talk a few hundred times. Anyway, hopefully, they have helped to make this a clear presentation. One of our EP physicians looked over the information and he and a device nurse also agreed

and they were wonderful. I do have the samples here, the Medtronic grip Trip Walker gave me. Anyway, you're welcome to come up and take a look at them. But before I do, do you have any questions? Yes.

- [Woman] So our Medtronic rep comes and does whatever he does, we never really know. We think you said (distant indistinct muttering) okay, they're sent to eight. We sit there with pulse ox on, they get scanned. We reset to whatever they were before and they leave,

so clearly I'm going to up it a little bit after seeing this talk. But he doesn't always stay. I know. So we don't have a device nurse. It's just this Medtronic rep.

Would that be-- - And how would you access him if you had an emergency? - [Woman] I don't know. That's what I'm going to work on-- - Totally. - [Woman] He has left the building before.

(indistinct chattering) I know! (distant indistinct muttering) - No, he shouldn't-- (distant indistinct muttering) - [Woman] So if he has the rest of these slides somehow, I mean, I got most of these but (mumbles) I got three pages here but the other things

that say like (distant indistinct muttering) stuff like that. - I don't, but it's going to be on the web or whatever they do, and it will all be there. distant indistinct muttering) Mm-hmm, mm-hmm. And your physicians, our docs know on the morning

of the procedure that all the devices that are going to happen, hopefully they will have reviewed that. - [Woman] This is how it works. Our scheduling calls the MRI, MRI says okay (mumbles) pacemaker.

An MRI technologist calls Medtronic. Medtronic or the other (mumbles) companies says yay or nay, this is our device. (distant indistinct muttering) Other than the ordering doctor, there's no doctor that knows that patient's there.

The cardiologist knows-- (overlapping dialogue) - According to this consensus statement, and it's all highlighted, you know, that if you're saying, "Hey, where are our guidelines "and how are we doing this and where does this come from?"

you have a really strong statement that is a little bit confusing. They've written a very concise guideline. It doesn't say a whole lot of information about much of anything actually in my opinion. But this statement is 50-some pages.

It has clinical studies and it has information about caring for these patients and how they should be assessed and programmed. (distant indistinct muttering) It is. And it's on the back actually of your paperwork too, the name of that study.

Mm-hmm? - [Woman] Just a question about traditional and nontraditional pace. Right now we only do, yeah, they did an x-ray (distant indistinct muttering). - You can't tell that from an x-ray.

- [Woman] Right, but I mean, the look of the model just to see if it's MRI compatible (distant indistinct muttering) just the actual pacer (distant indistinct muttering) and then we have, the EP comes down, (distant indistinct muttering) nurse that comes down and interrogates

and shuts the pacer, puts them in a certain mode before we do it, but I'm just concerned about the difference between traditional and nontraditional (distant indistinct muttering) - So she's questioning about conditional or nonconditional.

You can't tell by looking at the device. You need to have information from the programmer itself telling you what the device is and if there's a lead that matches it. Like I said one time we had recently had a patient that had a nonconditional lead,

but the device was deemed conditional. But it really would then made it a nonconditional system. And that has those extra requirements according to this guideline. Now it doesn't say this is the way it has to be. It says, your institution needs to adapt

or to make their own very clear protocols so that when you go into the scanner and you're taking responsibility for that patient, you know that they have been thoroughly, you're safe, as safe as can be. (distant indistinct muttering)

Nonconditional is a device that is not FDA approved. Conditional is FDA approved, whoops. And I think we're at about a couple seconds here, so if you have questions I'm glad to answer them. Back there too, but hmmm? (distant indistinct muttering)

She's been back there since the beginning. (distant indistinct muttering) I don't know that an LVAD would be compatible by any stretch of the imagination. Reveals or those monitors are actually, are MR compatible. There's also a single or a lead-less system

that is MR compatible. I have those up here too so if you want to take a look at those, you can. They're really cool little gadgets. But LVAD would not be. Whoops.

Sorry. - Just to keep on time because we have another like her starting. If we can just step out in the hallway and have her finish addressing your questions and getting the answers.

And to reiterate, just watch for your emails coming from ARIN and you'll have access to her lecture, her slides. So for people who want to make practice changes, it'll be available. - And I did put my contact information on those papers

that I handed you. If you have any questions, please let me know. (audience applause drowns out dialog) Thank you.

there a better option this is where a carotid artery stenting was developed over a couple decades ago and this is a

less invasive viable option for treating carotid artery stenosis it was generally started off as a trends ephemeral approach but I'll show you what the new approach is that many of us are involved in it involves the use of

in volunteer tection so it's one of the unique vascular territories where embolic protection is required if you're gonna get Medicare reimbursement for this you have to involvement and bollocky protection if you do without

you can do the procedure but you won't get it you won't get reimbursed and ultimately it's it was proven to show much better outcomes if you use involved protection because even doing the procedure and trying to place the stent

there is some small embolic degree that that that shuttles off and if it happens in the foot you may or may not lose a toe but if it happens in the brain you're gonna lose brain cells and it's gonna be potentially catastrophic so

significant adjunct to the stenting procedure is doing embolic protection and there's two types of embolic protection there's distal and there's proximal I'll walk through each of those with some diagrams here and then anyone

that gets a carotid stent has to be on dual antiplatelet therapy so if they have an allergy they're unable to be on aspirin and plavix they don't get a stent because there's early stent thrombosis that can't occur in these

patients if they don't have that dual antiplatelet therapy so let's go through

so my name's Heather I'm a nurse in interventional radiology at NYU Langone health in New York and I am the clinical resources for our department so what that means is I'm responsible for individualizing our education to meet the needs of our department and one of

the first things I wanted to look at when I took on the role was our procedural sedation practices and how we can improve by enhancing our knowledge this presentation includes many of the lessons and concepts that I learned

along the way that I think are really important to understanding how to effectively administer procedural sedation so our learning objectives are going to be a review of the guidelines pre-procedure assessment components

including airway assessment pharmacology of the medications that we give and intra procedure assessment so this is the 2018 AAS a practice guidelines for a procedural sedation by non anesthesiologist has everyone seen this

good great as so this is especially important because as you'll see the American College of Radiology and Society of interventional radiology were involved in its development so this is our guideline and I think it's really

important to look at this look at the practice recommendations and see how they align with your own practice and if there may be some changes you need to make first thing you always want to look at when you're reviewing any sort of

literature whether it's evidence-based guidelines or maybe just a review article is you want to look at the methodology that the author used to create the guideline so anybody know why that's important you just shout it out

so if I want to write a guideline for procedural sedation I could find a bunch of studies or review articles that fit my point of view and use them throw them at the bottom and that would be that but even if I use for an demise control

trials which are considered the gold standard of experimental research those randomized controlled trials could be poorly constructed randomized controlled trials so they may have introduced bias at some point into the study

that's skewed the outcome and the findings so you really want to make sure that the authors of the guideline that you're looking at appraise the research that they're using to support their recommendations and that's what the

aasa' task force did so they used randomized control trials and observational studies and then they categorize the strength and the quality of the study findings so as you're going through you'll see that statistically

significant was deemed a p-value of less than 0.01 and outcomes were designated as either beneficial harmful or equivocal equivocal meaning this findings were not significant one way or the other and then they also used

opinion based evidence from experts so they surveyed members of their task force and they did take into account some informal opinion from message boards and letters to the editor so I think a good example here is one of

their recommendations about capnography so they did a meta-analysis of randomized control trials that indicated that the use of continuous and title carbon dioxide monitoring was associated with a reduced frequency of hypoxemic

events when compared to monitoring without capnography and then you'll see at the end of the recommendations this category so for this particular recommendation they labeled it as category a1 - B evidence and what that's

telling you as category a means it was a randomized control trial which is great it was a level one meaning it's a high level of strength and quality and B is telling you that there was statistically significant findings that demonstrated

benefit to the patient now another recommendation that you may see as you're reading through would be the NPO guidelines so if you look at any of the literature about NPO recommendations it's really all expert

opinion because all of the evidence has shown equivocal findings so for example one of the studies they looked at compared the outcomes of patients who had clear liquids one hour prior to the procedure versus two hours and they

found no change in the outcome I think it's important when you're a provider and you're looking at that because you're gonna base your judgment calls on the evidence so you may have a patient come in who had tea up until one hour

prior to their procedure and you have to make a decision whether or not you want to cancel or proceed and you could look at the findings of the literature that shows that there really hasn't been a proven difference in outcomes so you may

decide to just do the procedure versus capnography there's very strong evidence showing it's beneficial to the patient always so I think this is a real big take-home point of why we do everything we do about procedural sedation all of

our assessments and enhancing our practice as a sedation is a continuum and practitioners intending to produce a given level of sedation should be able to rescue the patients whose level of sedation becomes deeper than initially

intended pre-procedure our assessment

checking on the patient periodically at least every five minutes and monitor the

response to verbal commands if a verbal response isn't possible come up with some technique with the patient ahead of time if they're gonna give you a thumbs up or thumbs down if they're gonna close one eye raise an eyebrow whatever they

want to do come up with that come up with that with them in advance and use that to guide their to their ability to maintain their airway because sedation is going to be the main indicator of eventual respiratory depression if

that's going to occur it's not going to be your respiratory rate or your other dimo dynamics it's going to be the level of sedation we we have this problem a lot one of the nurses came up to me the other day and said the doctor told me

not to talk to the patient during the procedure I said no that's just pull this up I always say pull up the guide line this is Society event you can say this is your Society they told me I need to assess the patient every five minutes

and assess their response to me there has to be some sort of verbal response the patient doesn't have to move their arms around or give you a hug it's it's really just saying I'm okay Richmond agitation sedation scale

this is what we use at NYU this is a scale essentially to measure the level of sedation our goal is to try to get patients into this negative three sometimes it's not always possible but we want to use this to determine whether

or not the patient is slipping into a deeper level of sedation and again that's important because this is going to tell us that the patient is then at risk for respiratory depression or apnea if they transition into a negative 4 or

negative 5 ventilatory depression and airway obstruction are two different problems I just think it's important to know this because it's gonna require two different rescue mechanisms although you will usually see both of these happening

at the same time I only saw one time where it was true ventilatory depression it was in the neuro suite does anybody do wadda tests yeah okay so I had only I've only seen this once but we gave the amytal and the patient had complete

depression of their respiratory center so she did not breathe at all we had to do really deep stimulation in order to get her to take a breath so we could have done all the airway maneuvers in the world it wasn't going to help her we

had to wake her brain up and tell her to take a breath if she didn't we would have had to have intubated her that would have been the only way to rescue her because as far as I know there's no reversal for the amytal that we give bag

mask ventilation this is the cornerstone of basic airway management it's not a skill easily mastered I think a lot of people will sometimes fly through this because you do this in ACLs if you worked in an ICU you did this a hundred

times but what's different between this and a sedation setting and in a code situation is the patient and the code is already dead the thing that's not going to save them is is you're good you know Ambu bag skills it's gonna be the CPR

what's going to save your patient who is respiratory depressed in a procedural sedation setting is effective airway skills because according to the H a ventilation via an Ambu bag may be just as effective as ventilation via an

endotracheal tube that's huge so you can buy your patients some time while you're getting the reverse or you're calling for an anesthesiologist to come and intubate them if you're not able to effectively

ventilate them and they progress to a CPA as I'm sure you're all aware that just is a major indicator for eventual poor outcomes the patient could experience some airway techniques that are helpful you can do the head tilt

chin lift or a jaw thrust in patients what you do want to be mindful of obviously if they're in c-spine precautions if you are doing the procedure with procedural sedation which I would caution against then you would

just go right to a jaw thrust you're obviously not going to manipulate their cervical spine and capnography I know everyone knows capnography I'm a huge huge fan of capnography I can't stress it enough I think does everyone use it

does anyone not use it you don't use it okay okay just know if you are having trouble getting your institution to provide the finances if that's their concern as I just showed you in the beginning of the presentation there is

very strong evidence showing that there it's a positive outcome for the patient if something was to happen one day with a patient and and maybe it was to go to litigation although guidelines aren't meant to be a

hard and fast rule likely it would be brought up in the litigation they would say why do all of these organizations recommend capnography but it wasn't used in your institution and then they may say well we haven't seen any cost

benefit and then they would say well but there is cost benefit it's level a one evidence so it's really really useful and most importantly pulse-ox is going to report an average saturation overtime so you are going to see some lag so it

could be one to two minutes before you actually see a change in the pulse ox and your patient may not have been breathing for those one to two minutes so once the pulse ox does go down it's going to go down real quick and also if

you want to look at some additional resources I think the air and capnography toolkit they did not ask me to say that but I do think it is actually really really great and it was put out

steer another thing I just want to say to make the capnography work for you I think in our institution we've been using it for a long time but it doesn't always work we use this nasal cannula that's supposed to have this nice little

reservoir but it's really not great because it's cold in the room so the plastic will stiffen and it flips up use some tape or I just put a simple mask over the nasal cannula and then you'll get your waveform you'll have the the

carbon dioxide captured I think there's some fancy masks out there I think Medtronic is may be releasing a mask that does a capnography which will be great but in the meantime just make it work for you and make it work in the

beginning of the procedure sooo as you're giving more and more sedation potentially you're not then worrying about futzing around with making the capnograph you work nonpharmacologic methods I think are really important so

we get this a lot Twilight are you giving me propofol it's the same as a colonoscopy right or you're gonna knock me out right right so these are really important conversations to have in the prep area when you're getting your

patient ready make them aware they're not going to have these things and be honest with them if they're adamant they want to be asleep they want the Twilight you reschedule there it's I have found it's not worth trying to convince them

to do something that they don't want to do because they're just gonna write a really nasty letter later and and I don't and I don't blame them because I think sometimes we're not honest and we think we're doing the right thing and

you know don't worry we'll get you through it were you gonna be really comfortable and sometimes patients aren't going to be comfortable and that's okay and if they're not okay with that then we have to do what we need to

do to make sure that we're meeting what their needs and that leads into setting realistic expectations I always tell patients you might not see me the whole time I'm gonna check on you at least every five minutes if you don't see me

it's because I'm right behind you tell me what you need every five minutes I'm going to say are you okay if you need to be a little bit more asleep if you're in pain you're having anxiety tell me and I'll give you more medication this is a

collaboration and I find that that really eases a lot of the anxiety especially them knowing you're right behind them the whole time if they can't see you like their tented you know without a halo I think yeah the covered

halo we were talking about before if they can't see you it gives them a lot of anxiety if they think no one's in the room and there's just a provider they can't see doing a procedure on them sedation scripts my attending left but

we had a little bit of a healthy argument about this so I talked to him about scripting the way that we talked to patients about sedation so we're all saying the same thing all the time and he said you know I'm an attending and I

I didn't do a residency and a fellowship to be a robot and all these things and you know it was and I he loves giving me a hard time about this stuff so it was kind of funny because he's doing he's currently engaged in a grant project

that's looking at our work flow throughout the institution and he has research assistants that are working on it with him and one of the things that they did was they went on the floor with some of our residents who are consenting

the patients for procedures and she the very next day in a meeting it was totally unrelated it said to him you know they're saying the wackiest things to the patients some of them are saying don't worry about it you'll be asleep

yeah yeah it's like whatever you had last time and they're really not setting them up with realistic expectations so when we get them at least our impatience when we get them down stairs for their procedure they're totally confused about

what they're gonna have done and then I think they feel very anxious because they're about to go right into the room and now we're telling them you're not going to be asleep you'll you'll be able to talk to me during the keys so you're

not saying everyone has to be a robot and say exactly the same thing but I you may want to talk to your staff about hitting the same take-home messages so that they're not hearing all different descriptions of sedation throughout

their stay all right thank you everyone

ablating things in the bones well musculoskeletal blasian we're fortunate within our practice that we have a doctor councilman Rochester who's

a probably one of the biggest world's experts on this and these are his cases that he shared but you can see when you have small little lesions and bones that are painful you can place probes in them and you freeze them the tumor dies and

musculoskeletal things remain intact what about when you have cases like this where there's a fracture going through the iliac bone on the left with an infiltrate of malignancy well you can cryo blade it and what's cool about is

you can using CT guidance do percutaneous cannulated pins and screws and a cement o plasti ver bladed cavity and when you're done the patient who initially couldn't walk now can and whose pain scale went down to one so I

think that's that's very important to realize the potential of image-guided medicine this is something that previously would have had to been done in the orthopedic lab so you know I think this is extending options where

otherwise it would have been difficult same thing applies to the spine you can ablate and fill them with cement so

blasian it's well tolerated and folks with advanced pulmonary disease there's a prospective trial that showed that

there are pulmonary function does not really change after an ablation but the important part here is a lot of these folks who are not candidates for surgical resection have bad hearts a bad coronary disease and bad lungs to where

a lot of times that's actually their biggest risk not their small little lung cancer and you can see these two lines here the this is someone who dr. du Puy studied ablation and what happens if you recur and how your survival matches that

and turns out that if you recur and in if you don't actually a lot of times this file is very similar because these folks are such high risk for mortality outside or even their cancer so patient selection is really important for this

where do we use it primary metastatic lesions essentially once we feel that someone is not a good surgical candidate and they have maintained pulmonary function they have a reasonable chance for surviving a long

time we'll convert them to being an ablation candidate here's an example of a young woman who had a metastatic colorectal met that was treated with SPRT and it continued to grow and was avid so you can see the little nodule

and then the lower lobe and we paste the placement prone and we'd Vance a cryo plugs in this case of microwave probe into it and you turn off about three to five minutes and it's usually sufficient to burn it it cavitate s-- afterwards

which is expected but if you follow it over time the lesion looks like this and you say okay fine did it even work but if you do a PET scan you'll see that there's no actually activity in there and that's usually pretty definitive for

those small lesions like that about three centimeters is the most that will treat in a lot of the most attic patients but you can certainly go a little bit larger here's her follow-up actually two years

that had no recurrence so what do you do when you have something like this so this is encasing the entire left upper lobe this patient underwent radiation therapy had a low area of residual activity we followed it and it turns out

that ended up being positive on a biopsy for additional cancer so now we're playing cleanup which is that Salvage I mentioned earlier we actually fuse the PET scan with the on table procedural CT so we know which part of all that

consolidated lung to target we place our probes and this is what looks like afterwards it's a big hole this is what happens when you microwave a blade previously radiated tissue having said that this

was a young patient who had no other options and this is the only side of disease this is probably an okay complication for that patient to undergo so if you follow up with a PET scan three months later there's no residual

activity and that patient actually never recurred at that site so what about

patient like this you have a very large left lateral HCC that's invading the left the patek vein and extending into the heart since when we get into things like radioembolisation if you have

multifocal liver disease if you want to apply radiation therapy to that's very difficult to do that because it actually requires more radiation dose to kill HCC than it does the adjacent normal liver the liver is actually that ready

sensitive so you can do things like SBRT and pick an individual lesion you can do things like a imrt which is you know survey 8 non focus generalize low dose but what's interesting Malaysian is that if you administer

particles they only shoot about two millimeters worth of the raishin field around it so of what used is that with one not much but if you put eight to forty million of them within the bloodstream they Auto sort themselves

based off of the vascular flow preferential that exists with tumors tumors actually emit hormones pull in blood supply that you weren't born with and that actually tends to pull beads from the bloodstream preferentially

towards it so this is an example where you stain a tumor with two types of wax one the portal that's blue one the artery that's red and you can see how much that preferential exists so what ends up happening is these spheres

cluster within the tumor and then provide local dose radiation that's very hot where the tumor is and low elsewhere so here's an example of that this is a patient with metastatic neuroendocrine disease multifocal liver lesions you can

see that vascular flow preferential this is what it looks like on the maa when we jecht a protein particle surrogate that has a technician I should have assigned to it just as a visualization of how the particle is

going to sort out and the post y9t bremsstrahlung CT is over there and you can see how intense the necrosis is within the tumor and how much it's spared the normal liver however you do get some radiation damage they don't

live a regardless that's why choosing the timing of when you're gonna do this is important this is a patient that was treated with tastes above and one session of y9u beneath so you can see that they do have different types of

therapeutic mechanisms they're not the same even though they look very similar in terms of when we're administering

the traditional three pillars are

surgical medical and rad honk which actually was once part of radiology and separated just like interventional radiology has and where is the role for this last column so many patients are not medically operable so if you set the

gold standard you know that the cure for someone has a primary liver mass well about 20 percent of patients who present can undergo resection what you do for the remaining portion so Salvage is what we offer when someone has undergone

standard of care and it didn't work how do we hop back in and try to see how much these folks it's low-risk it's not very expensive at all as compared to things like surgery and the recovery is usually the same date so

this concept here of tests of time is kind of interesting a lot of times when we look at a tumor let's say it's 2 centimeters it's not really the size of the tumor but it's how nasty of a player it is and it's

difficult to find out sometimes so what we do is we'll treat it using an IR technique and watch the patient and if they do well then we can subject them then to the more aggressive therapy and it's more worthwhile because we've found

that that person is going to be someone who's likely going to benefit you can use this in conjunction with other treatments and repeat therapy is well tolerated and finally obviously palliation is very important as we try

to focus on folks quality of life and again this can be done in the outpatient setting so here's a busy slide but if you just look at all the non-surgical options that you have here for liver dominant primary metastatic liver

disease everything that's highlighted in blue is considered an interventional oncology technique this is these the main document that a lot of international centers use to allocate people to treatments when they have

primary liver cancer HCC and if you see if you see at the very bottom corner there in very early-stage HCC actually ablation is a first-line therapy and they made this switch in 2016 but it's the first time that an

intervention illogic therapy was actually recommended in lieu of something like surgery why because it's lesions are very small its tolerated very well and it's the exact same reason why your dermatologists can freeze a

lesion as opposed to having to cut everything off all the time at a certain point certain tumors respond well and it's worth the decrease in morbidity so

Disclaimer: Content and materials on Medlantis are provided for educational purposes only, and are intended for use by medical professionals, not to be used self-diagnosis or self-treatment. It is not intended as, nor should it be, a substitute for independent professional medical care. Medical practitioners must make their own independent assessment before suggesting a diagnosis or recommending or instituting a course of treatment. The content and materials on Medlantis should not in any way be seen as a replacement for consultation with colleagues or other sources, or as a substitute for conventional training and study.