Create an account and get 3 free clips per day.
Chapters
Multifocal Right HCC|Gel Foam, TACE|
Multifocal Right HCC|Gel Foam, TACE|
2016NoneNotTranscribedSIR
Cone Beam CT | Interventional Oncology
Cone Beam CT | Interventional Oncology
ablationanatomicangioarteriesarteryartifactbeamchaptercombconecontrastdoseembolicenhancementenhancesesophagealesophagusgastricgastric arteryglucagonhcchepatectomyinfusinglesionliverlysisoncologypatientsegmentstomach
Putting it all Together and Evaluation - Curriculum Week 3 | Cath Lab Academy: An Adjunct to an Orientation Program Using an Interprofessional Approach
Putting it all Together and Evaluation - Curriculum Week 3 | Cath Lab Academy: An Adjunct to an Orientation Program Using an Interprofessional Approach
adjunctiveAtherectomy DevicebasicallyBoston ScientificchaptercontinuedeviceelectronicequipmentevaluateevaluationsfeedbackinterventionalivusNoneplaqueprogramRotobladersimulatedsimulationstakeholdersultrasoundvendors
Benefits of UFE | Uterine Artery Embolization The Good, The Bad, The Ugly
Benefits of UFE | Uterine Artery Embolization The Good, The Bad, The Ugly
arterycenterschapterembolizationfibroidgooglegynecologistgynecologistsgynecologyhysterectomieshysterectomyinterventionalMRINonepainfulpatientsprocedureproceduresseansmartersurgeryuterine
Q&A- Documentation, Before and After results, Leadership, Culture | Innovation and Application of Real Time Nursing Dashboards
Q&A- Documentation, Before and After results, Leadership, Culture | Innovation and Application of Real Time Nursing Dashboards
accomplishchapterculturedatadocumentationdocumentinginterventionalleadershipmanagermodalityNonenursenursesnursingpatientphysiciansprojectprojectsradiologyroundingteamtechnologisttechnologists
General Screening Criteria (specific to bleeding risk) | Risk Mitigation: Periprocedural Screening and Anticoagulation Guidelines to Reduce Interventional Radiology Bleeding Risks
General Screening Criteria (specific to bleeding risk) | Risk Mitigation: Periprocedural Screening and Anticoagulation Guidelines to Reduce Interventional Radiology Bleeding Risks
acuityalertanticoagulantanticoagulationbiopsybleedingcardiacchapterchartdysfunctionhematologicalhistoryhypertensivelivermedicationsNonepatientpatientsplavixprocedureprovidersradiologistsriskstablestentthrombocytopenia
Introduction to Respiratory Compromise | Respiratory Compromise: Use of Capnography During Procedural Sedation
Introduction to Respiratory Compromise | Respiratory Compromise: Use of Capnography During Procedural Sedation
anesthesiachaptercliniciancrnainterventionalmajorityMedtronicNonepresentationslides
MRI Safety & Screening | PET/MRI: A New Technique to Obtain High Quality Diagnostic Images for Oncology Patients
MRI Safety & Screening | PET/MRI: A New Technique to Obtain High Quality Diagnostic Images for Oncology Patients
aneurysmassesscardchaptercontraindicateddefibrillatorsimplantimplantsinjectedinjectionmraMRINonepacemakerspatientpatientsradioactiveremovescanscreenedshieldingzone
Theories on Accident Causation | Looking for risk in all the Right Places: The Anatomy of Errors in Healthcare
Theories on Accident Causation | Looking for risk in all the Right Places: The Anatomy of Errors in Healthcare
anatomychapterdefensesfailuresinterventionalmistakesNoneoccurringpatientvisible
Innovative Learning, Testimonials, and Program Results | Cath Lab Academy: An Adjunct to an Orientation Program Using an Interprofessional Approach
Innovative Learning, Testimonials, and Program Results | Cath Lab Academy: An Adjunct to an Orientation Program Using an Interprofessional Approach
academybasedcathcath labchaptercohortcohortscompetentcomponentensureimpactinterventionalmanagersmeasuremetricsmonthsNoneorientationoutcomespathwayplatformprogramradiologyskillssubsequentsuccesssurvey
Practice Guidelines | Procedural Sedation: An Education Review
Practice Guidelines | Procedural Sedation: An Education Review
anesthesiologistassessmentbeneficialcategorychaptercontrolenhancingequivocalevidencefindingsguidelineguidelinesinterventionallabeledliteraturemonitoringNoneobservationalopinionoutcomespatientpharmacologypracticeproceduralprocedureradiologyrandomizedrecommendationsreviewsedationstatisticallystudiestrialsversus
Q&A Pulmonary Embolism | Management of Patients with Acute & Chronic PE
Q&A Pulmonary Embolism | Management of Patients with Acute & Chronic PE
acuteangiogramassistedcatheterchapterchroniccontrastdiagnosticechocardiogramembolismisisNonepressurepulmonarythrombolysistreatmentultrasound
Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty | Management of Patients with Acute & Chronic PE
Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty | Management of Patients with Acute & Chronic PE
angiogramangioplastyarteryballoonballooningbandschaptercomplicationscontrastflowHorizonimageimagesluminalNoneocclusionocclusionspatientsproximallypulmonaryradiationrecanstenosisthrombustreatedultrasoundwebs
Cath Lab Simulation | Cath Lab Academy: An Adjunct to an Orientation Program Using an Interprofessional Approach
Cath Lab Simulation | Cath Lab Academy: An Adjunct to an Orientation Program Using an Interprofessional Approach
cathchaptercontrastfluoroscopyinjectingMenticemockNonenursespracticingscenariosimulationsimulatorvaluable
The Path Forward | Uterine Artery Embolization The Good, The Bad, The Ugly
The Path Forward | Uterine Artery Embolization The Good, The Bad, The Ugly
chapterembolizationfibroidfibroidsgynecologistgynecologyhysterectomyinterventionalNoneobgynPathophysiologypatientpatientsprocedureproceduresprogramsurgicallyworkup
CTEPH Studies | Management of Patients with Acute & Chronic PE
CTEPH Studies | Management of Patients with Acute & Chronic PE
acutearterieschapterchroniccpapedemainterdisciplinaryjapanmultidisciplinarymultipleNoneoperatorspatientpatientsperformedpulmonaryreperfusionrequiringthrombolysistreatedtreatmentvascular
CT Imaging- Acute PE | Management of Patients with Acute & Chronic PE
CT Imaging- Acute PE | Management of Patients with Acute & Chronic PE
acuteangiogramappearancearrowarteriescenteredchapterclassiccontrastcoronalimaginginfarctluminalNonepatientperfusionpulmonarysagittalscansegmentalsurroundingtechnologistthrombolysisthrombusvesselview
How We Established our Practice Guidelines | Risk Mitigation: Periprocedural Screening and Anticoagulation Guidelines to Reduce Interventional Radiology Bleeding Risks
How We Established our Practice Guidelines | Risk Mitigation: Periprocedural Screening and Anticoagulation Guidelines to Reduce Interventional Radiology Bleeding Risks
anticoagulationcallschapterclinicaldatabaseguidelineslivermayomedicationNonenursespanelpatientpatientsphysiciansprocedureradiologistradiologistsspecialtytriagevalues
Ultrasound-assisted Catheter-directed Thrombolysis | Management of Patients with Acute & Chronic PE
Ultrasound-assisted Catheter-directed Thrombolysis | Management of Patients with Acute & Chronic PE
catheterchapterekosfibrinNonerequiresstudiesthrombolysisthrombustpaultrasound
Systemic vs Catheter-based Thrombolysis | Management of Patients with Acute & Chronic PE
Systemic vs Catheter-based Thrombolysis | Management of Patients with Acute & Chronic PE
bleedingcatheterchaptermilligramNonepatientpatientsperiodriskslowersystemictargetedthrombolysistpaversus
Introduction- Innovation & Application of Nursing Dashboards | Innovation and Application of Real Time Nursing Dashboards
Introduction- Innovation & Application of Nursing Dashboards | Innovation and Application of Real Time Nursing Dashboards
chapterdatainterventionaljeannejourneylearnmammographymanagermeaningfulmultidisciplinaryNonenurseobjectiveoperationsradiologystoriesstrategy
Percutaneous Mechanical Intervention | Management of Patients with Acute & Chronic PE
Percutaneous Mechanical Intervention | Management of Patients with Acute & Chronic PE
catheterchapterclotmassivemechanicalNonepatientpatientsPig Tail Catheterpigtailpulmonarysurgerythrombolytictpa
Indirect Angiography | Interventional Oncology
Indirect Angiography | Interventional Oncology
ablateablationablativeaneurysmangioangiographybeamBrachytherapycandidateschapterdefinitivelyembolizationentirehccindirectintentinterdisciplinaryischemiclesionographypatientportalresectionsbrtsurgicaltherapyvein
Introduction to Establishing Periprocedural Screening Guidelines to reduce bleeding risk associated with Image-Guided Theraputic and Diagnostic Procedures | Risk Mitigation: Periprocedural Screening and Anticoagulation Guidelines to Reduce Interventional Radiology Bleeding Risks
Introduction to Establishing Periprocedural Screening Guidelines to reduce bleeding risk associated with Image-Guided Theraputic and Diagnostic Procedures | Risk Mitigation: Periprocedural Screening and Anticoagulation Guidelines to Reduce Interventional Radiology Bleeding Risks
anticoagulantscampuschapterclinicclinicalcoagulationgraduatedguidedguidelineshospitalinpatientinpatientsinterventionallabsmayomedicationsneuroNonenonvascularnursenursingpatientspracticeproceduresradiologistsradiologyrochesterspecialistultrasoundvascular
PET/MRI vs PET/CT | PET/MRI: A New Technique to Obtain High Quality Diagnostic Images for Oncology Patients
PET/MRI vs PET/CT | PET/MRI: A New Technique to Obtain High Quality Diagnostic Images for Oncology Patients
biliarycentimeterchaptercoilcoilscontraindicationscoworkersdiameterexposureimagesimagingimplantskidneyslimitationsmachinemodalityMRINonepatientpelvicpreferredradiationradiofrequencyscannerskinstructuresthoracictissue
Therapies for Acute PE | Management of Patients with Acute & Chronic PE
Therapies for Acute PE | Management of Patients with Acute & Chronic PE
anticoagulantanticoagulationcatheterchapterclotcoumadindefensesdirectedheparininpatientintermediatelovenoxNonepatientpatientsplasminogenprocessriskrotationalstreptokinasesystemicsystemicallythrombectomythrombolysisthrombustpa
Pharmacology- Versed | Procedural Sedation: An Education Review
Pharmacology- Versed | Procedural Sedation: An Education Review
albuminchaptercirculatingdrugenzymeexcretedkidneymetabolitemetabolizedneuralNoneopioidspatientsprolongedprophylaxisproteinvasospasmverapamilversed
Scope of IR Procedures in South Africa | South African Interventional Society (SAintS)
Scope of IR Procedures in South Africa | South African Interventional Society (SAintS)
biliarycardiologistscenterschapterinterventionalInterventionsneuroparacentesisproceduressurgeonsvascular
Aspiration Thrombectomy | Management of Patients with Acute & Chronic PE
Aspiration Thrombectomy | Management of Patients with Acute & Chronic PE
angioAngiodynamicsAngiovac CannulaAspirex CathetercatheterschapterclotdevicedevicesfrenchIndigo ThrombectomyNonepatientPenumbraPenumbra Inc.sheathStraub Medicalthrombectomythrombustpa
Transcript

know we're running a bit short on time so I want to briefly just touch about

some techniques with comb beam CT which are very helpful to us there are a lot of reasons why you should use comb beam CT it gives us the the most extensive anatomic understanding of vascular territories and the implications for

that with oncology are extremely valuable because of things like margin like we discussed here's an example of a patient who had a high AF P and their bloodstream which tells us that they have a cancer in her liver we can't see

it on the CT there but if you do a cone beam CT it stands up quite nicely why because you're giving levels of contrast that if you were to give them through a peripheral IV it would be toxic to the patient but when you're infusing into a

segment the body tolerates at the problem so patient preparation anxa lysis is key you have them exhale above three seconds prior to that there's a lot of change to how we're doing this people who are introducing radial access

power injection anywhere from about 50 to even sometimes thirty to a hundred percent contrast depends on what phase you're imaging we have a Animoto power injector that allows us to slide what contrast concentration we like a lot of

times people just rely on 30% and do their whole the case with that some people do a hundred percent image quality this is what it looks like when someone's breathing this is very difficult to tell if there's complete

lesion enhancement so if you do your comb beam CT know it looks like this this is trying to coach the patient and try to get them to hold still and then this is the patient after coaching which looks like this so you can tell that you

have a missing portion of the lesion and you have to treat into another segment what about when you're doing an angio and you do a cone beam CT NIT looks like this this is what insufficient counts looks like on comb beam so when you see

these sort of Shell station lines that are going all over the screen you have to raise dose usually in larger patients but this is you know you either slow down the acquisition speed of your comb beam or

you raise dose this is what it looks like after we gave it a higher dose protocol it really changes everything those lines are still there but they're much smaller how do you know if you have enhancement or a narrow artifact you can

repeat with non-contrast CT and give the patient glucagon and you can find the small very these small arteries that pick off the left that commonly profuse the stomach the right gastric artery you can use your comb beam CT to find

non-target evaluation even when your angio doesn't suggest it so this is a patient they have recurrent HCC we didn't angio from here those arteries down there where those coils were looked funny even though the patient was

quote-unquote coiled off we did a comb beam CT and that little squiggly C shape structures that duodenum that's contrast going in it this would be probably a lethal event for the patient or certainly would require surgery if you

treated that much with y9t reposition the catheter deeper towards the lesion and you can repeat your comb beam CT and see that you don't have an hands minh sometimes you have these little accessory left gastric artery this is

where we really need your help you know a lot of times everyone's focused and I think the more eyes the better for these kind of things but we're looking for these little tiny vessels that sometimes hop out of the liver and back into the

stomach or up into the esophagus there's a very very small right gastric artery in this picture here this patient post hepatectomy that rides along the inferior surface of the liver it's a little curly cube so and this is a small

esophageal branch so when you do comb beam TT this is what the stomach looks like when it enhances and this is what the esophagus looks like when it enhances you can do non contrast comb beam CTS to confirm ablation so you have

a lesion this is the comb beam CT for enhancement you treat with your embolic and this is a post to determine that you've had completely shin coverage and you can see how that correlates a response so the last thing we're going

basically putting it all together we go into basically a lot of our adjunctive tools so are a lot of our interventional equipment so I've as rotablator a threat

to me devices etc and so we really rely heavily on our vendors for the support and they're great to work with they love coming in they left to teach and actually and it's also a little bit of a break from for the learners for other

than listening to Alice and I so they like kind of having the vendors come in and they get a chance to play with the equipment as well and then our last day we do basically a wrap-up we'd do it the same quiz at the very beginning and then

we do a final simulation exercise which we have some pictures for as well and then they finish up with their clinical component okay so here are some examples some pictures that we took with our learners

experiencing and playing with the equipment the simulated equipment that our vendors brought in so this is some of the learners I think that's the Arth rectum a device so they did bring a simulated or threat

to me device and so the learners got to play with it got to understand it obviously our techs and nurses are not doing the procedure the physicians are so they never have a chance to actually play with the equipment or or use the

equipment on a real patient so this was kind of an eye-opener for them understanding how the Arthur ectomy works and how it D bulks and how it takes away calcium so that was a fun experience for them and our second

picture is just an example of an Ibis when we brought in our ibis vendors identifying what plaque looks like in an artery and through the intravascular ultrasound right so learning where the plaque is located if the descent Rick it

is not so there's so many different components of our inner vascular ultrasound that they actually learned a lot from as well so a couple examples of that so this is just a live picture of our learners playing with the Arthur

ectomy device I think that's the rotablator and they've improved their rotablator so it's not the nitrous tank that weighs three tons coming in the room we did so they did improve that so again just an example of them using the

simulated equipment and I think they really enjoyed that so again we wanted to really evaluate our learners we also wanted to evaluate our programs so again like I mentioned we did a pre post test and so and afterwards we did a

statistical analysis of their scores to determine really did this make a difference at least in their knowledge and what we found was it was statistically significant as evidenced by the P level of being less than point

zero zero one we also include doing pop quizzes pretty much every week and maybe every other day and so I know that they hated it but it actually helped us to really put into place where we needed to focus and what we needed to

review so that really helped us a lot and then again simulation and we go into that a little bit more too so again with the program overall we really looked at participant feedback through electronic evaluations we also did a start-stop

continue exercise at the very on our very last day because we wanted to get real-time feedback and so now that we've been through it about a year I think we may stop doing that however we will continue to do at least the electronic

evaluations at the end of the course and our learners were very satisfied with this program so a 3.97 out of 4 on a Likert scale really it's telling us that they really enjoy this program and they gave us very valuable feedback we also

got preceptor feedback and we also did a debriefing with what we call our governance team so basically a lot of the stakeholders that I mentioned before especially our operational leaders and our chief medical officer really going

into that and finding out what is it that we needed to really improve how can we continue to support etc and and everything else like that so very

Sean I know you have not seen these slides at all you wanted I John can talk about this with his eyes closed so it's

not like there's anything but this is the data that was published from the Jade publishing jvi are from what Sean has written and it's just the current standards relating to what you should be expecting what we tell our patients that

they should expect for outcomes as it relates to uterine artery embolization again I'm not really here to try to point this I know you can google these you can get the information yourself but just to say that all of our procedures

have risk and we need to be clear with our patients about them now I believe that with all of these risks combined the benefits of doing uterine fibroid embolization for most patients is far greater than the risk and that's why I

really do have my practice so these are the benefits right shorter hospital stay and I would say more cost-effective and that is really debatable because gynecologists have become smarter and smarter now they're doing like same-day

hysterectomies if you have a vaginal hysterectomy then maybe a UFE is not as cost-effective because they don't have to do an MRI beforehand and they don't get an MRI afterwards and do all of that anyway and if you look at the long-term

cost of that then maybe having a hysterectomy in some patients could be that but we know for sure that patients are more satisfied when they get a embolization procedure than in my MEC to me not in the beginning run because the

procedure can be very painful that is not the procedure itself is painful but post embolization syndrome which could last anywhere from five to seven days can can be very painful again this is the comparative data that was published

by dr. Spees who is our gold medal winner this year understand a lot a lot of work in this space has allowed us to have this conversation with our gynecology partners but also with our patients as we talked about like when

can you return to work how long are you going to be all for you know am I going to need extra child care or whatever how long would I be in the hospital this information helps us to inform our patients about that then on average

you'll stay in the hospital around you know a day or so and most uterine artery embolization procedures are same-day procedures and interventional radiologists are doing these in freestanding centers as well as other

providers without any issues so we're almost down to the end we know that fibroid embolization is proven to be an effective and durable a procedure for controlling patient symptoms it's minimally invasive and it's outpatient

most patients can go back to some normal activity in one to two weeks it has a low complication rates and some patients mein neatest to surgery and should have surgery so in our practice we send around 1/3 of our patients or so to

surgery and the reason that that is that high is that patients are allowed to come and see myself or dr. de riz Nia from the street they do not have to be referred from their gynecologist and so they're just coming from the street then

you will be referring them to a gynecologist because of some of the things that may not make them a good candidate for embolization such as this

about you rolled out the radiant in 2015 and all of this data is great but it's reliant on the nurses documenting it in

all their different areas so how did you did you actually when you built this dashboard did you leave blanks because you just didn't have the data available or did you circle back around and hold the nurses accountable how did you do

that trying to motivate them and engage them rather than it looking like a disciplinary action because you're showing that they're not documenting appropriately yes and that's part of our journey from 2013 we started all these

projects it became evident that document documentation was important when it came to the data and so we actually started training from our technologists and and then to our nurses we created standard work for how they documented time stamps

I'm at different points in the process we audit we audited that for a while to make sure that they were compliant with that documentation so so we embarked on a lot of projects and I did a to greenbelt projects I did one in

interventional radiology and I did one on beginning complete because you really have to start at the ground and if people's reporting is not good you have to fix it so we have a definition for beginning complete for our

technologists which cleaned their data up then we did a project with Jeannie's nurses around and Tommy did some auditing around the time stamps in their system and that took a long time so yes you have to clean your data up first

and that takes projects in order and we also did Tommy led all of us to look at our data and a data validate sort of like Gilbert's thing you know so is it really valid and so we did a lot of work around that as well

the nurses do with themselves and the nursing supervisor did it as well to make sure and the technologists help you with that because what we found is when we handed the data to the nurses and we had them do their audits it was more

impactful than when we did it how would you say your start times improved from pre project pre dashboard to current how did you measure that was the time yes so that was actually interesting especially in interventional radiology because it

it when we started rolling off the Huddle's and the dashboards we had some participation in the with the technologists and the nurses and the providers doing their Huddle's and looking at the information and then

there was a period of time when they stopped doing that and they actually and they actually saw a drop in there on time starts so when we started up they were around maybe 40% on-time start and then when they consistently did their

Huddle's and looked at the - would I use the information they quickly jumped to 60 65 percent so and when they stopped dropped again so it was sort of it proved that that the tools actually worked and now they're actually going

back and owning the work of their own to continue T their Huddle's and use the dashboards in real time yeah rome wasn't built in a day and would you say that this is significantly impacted employee engagement yes I will definitely say it

has previously we had a real sort of segmented nursing work you know silo's and now we have like this cohesive team of nursing and and physicians and technologists working together in IR I will say also part of

our leadership team crisp as part of this as well our senior leaders we did a job we did a change in sort of our leadership structure so before it was like the physicians they led their physicians the technologists led their

technician technologists and the nurses led theirs well we in got a team together so we have a nurse manager the chair of interventional radiology the nursing supervisor and the nursing technologist

and supervisor and we lead as a team now and so we look at volumes together we look at budgets together we look at staffing together so it's not no longer just leading in silos so with that consistency in that that that sort of

got them all together and then so then they see that you can't hit a technologist against a nurse in a physician against a nurse or a technologist because we're all one team and that was a big part of helping this

out yeah sorry before that I was just going to talk about how important leadership was in this so Chris is our operations manager and I would say she made all of this perseverance tommy's the brains I'm the Brawn so I

would like to ask you give more details on the culture like what you were just describing about becoming a multidisciplinary team sure um that's a good vision but practically how did you accomplish so the culture was really

really hard and my Greenbelt project that I did back in 2013 was not successful because of the culture and what we learned was that we had to do something about the culture Jeannie alluded to the fact that our our

department chair dr. chair Toth and our administrative director Karen Buttrey talked to me about this and and they decided it was important that they had leadership teams in each modality so every modality and radiology has a

leader it is the division director the technologists lead and if there's a nurse a nursing lead they meet once a month tommy's does the score cards for them they bring their score cards they bring their a3 reports on

their strategic plan and they sit as a group I sit with them as well and we talk about how they're aligning their strategy to their work what the culture is like and do we need help sometimes we bring HR in if we think we need help

and geney's done a lot of leadership training with the nurses she's very good at it we have Conaty so we've partnered with Dartmouth and we send different teams to Conaty to learn leadership training this

has been really this all started really in 2013 and it continues today and we work just as hard on it as we did in 2013 Neverending yeah and I was part of that Conaty training and it was phenomenal so

it was two of the IR physicians myself the business manager and another radiology technologist supervisor and so really we had to work on a project together and it really brought us together to understand each other's work

and for um I feel like probably the strongest you know asset I have is relationships and and making those connections and nursing wasn't my first career I did practice management and so I worked for a doctor's office and I

kind of know that you have to sort of make sure that everyone understands that we're all trying to get we're all trying to take care of the patient and we all have different responsibilities to do so and there's a crossover if we fight

against each other then nothing's going to work and so that was where I I feel like I probably did the best these again you know brains and brawn and I was just sort of like let's make it all work together people with it so

was that something that you had to work into the amount of hours that it takes to maintain the new task that was being asked for yes so the documentation is part of their work to take care of the patient so for a technologist for

example when they go get the patient from the waiting room they start the beginning the exam in Radian those are things they need to do - as part of the EMR to actually accomplish their work so that was by design already part of their

workflow we just had to make sure that they were all doing it at the same point in time so for example before we standardized the definitions we would have some technologists who would begin the exam when they went to go again the

patient some will do it after they had set up the rooms so we have to standardize all of it so the data was measuring at the same points and for the nurses as well as part of their documentation as they work up the

patient so it's all part of the flow the other thing we do that I want to mention quickly because we're out of time is rounding so rounding is really important so I am the operations manager I probably around three times a day in

every modality and as an example I was just in mr and I saw a red button on their dashboard and I said why aren't we 19 minutes behind and somebody had forgot to complete the exam and everybody was there and they were

talking to me about it and they said yep and they ran back and they you know so I stay engaged the supervisors Jeanne I have two other supervisors tomy rounds you have to keep the conversation going you can't just build these and think

they're gonna take care of themselves because they're not you have to really do that disciplined rounding work so thank you everyone very much yeah thank you and just some related articles that

other other institutions have used for healthcare dashboards I found really really great so I don't know if this is true but I think they're going to send the slides after yeah conference oh yeah yeah afterwards we're happy to stay here

thank you

guys do so when we do our screening phone calls and our pre screens before

the actual procedure there's a few factors that we look at for the patients with blood pressure the patient needs to be vitally stable before we do a procedure there may be a slightly increased risk of bleeding for kidney

biopsy if patients are hypertensive although it hasn't been noted to be statistically significant in the literature so we are always aware of patients being hypertensive we do want them to be taking their medications the

day of the procedure we also do a full medication reconciliation with the patient making sure that we're checking on any anti platelets anticoagulant medications and we have a list of our hold times that we use for a reference

we already discussed for those of you who are at this session this morning the issue of liver disease is it stable liver disease they may have adequate he stasis even though their INR is not within the normal range and so we

recommend a stable INR of less than 2.5 for those patients and in our practice a lot of the providers are going away from correcting the INR s for our patients we also screen for hematological disorders do they have some known condition that

makes them more likely to bleed or conversely more likely to clot and that may factor into whether or not anticoagulation can be held do they have a current diagnosis of cancer are they going to be getting one of those

angiogenesis inhibitors might they have thrombocytopenia and we just do a brief review of the patient's chart before we call them to kind of look for those diagnoses do they have a history of bleeding especially if they have no one

platelet dysfunction you know a known history of bleeding can be a reliable predictor of bleeding risk for some patients and do they have a cardiac or a neurological history as we learned this morning patients that have recently had

a cardiac stent placed we can't just say yeah stop your plavix hold off 5 days it'll be fine that could be a very serious risk to the patient did they recently have a stroke have they had a PE why are they on their anticoagulation

if they're on it so we really need to be aware of the whole patient and having that pre-screening phone call with them can allow our nurses to figure out a lot of these problems and then alert the radiologists and try and troubleshoot

before the patient walks in the door and says yeah I took my warfarin this morning I'm all ready for my liver biopsy the radiologists don't like that much in it you know it's really a bad thing for our high volume area to have

that happen and this is just another chart of our oh did I get mixed up here you guys are gonna fire me from running this clicker there we go so the whole times are again based on the half-life and the mechanism of action and this is

pretty similar to what you saw in the the presentation earlier today and specifically that imbruvica that's something that we alert the radiologists who they have a discussion with the patient decide is this something that we

want to continue with and I will say that in our practice with the volume and the the level of acuity of our patients I think that a lot of our providers are fairly comfortable with a certain level of risk because that's just who our

patient population is you know we have a very large hospital two large hospitals and very sick patients so that's something that we you know some of them are more comfortable than others but it's a risk-benefit thing that they have

to decide on themselves with the patient obviously all right so here are our

thank you Michael thank you to Medtronic for having me and thank you to the AI a your organization for having me today I seem to be having a little trouble advancing my slides so I'm just gonna get started with my introduction here we go

so I'm here's my disclosures basically I am sponsored by Medtronic to provide this Lunch and Learn for you but I am an active clinician I work actively at Yale as a CRNA and I do provide the majority of my anesthesia in what we call our off

floor locations meaning interventional radiology EP lab GI endoscopy r zh' in the operating room so I understand the challenges you face I do you know the sedation in those rooms myself so I understand the positioning concerns the

monitoring concerns and so I'm really I'm honored to be here today and I hope that I add value to your conference while you're having lunch I won't talk about anything that is off-label use everything I will present today is

evidence-based medicine and had been proven I'm not here to sell you any products or talk you into buying anything I just really strictly clinician to clinician so starting out we only have

an hour and I really want to make sure I get through everything today so I'm gonna ask if you have any questions to please hold them to the end and that's for a couple reasons because if you have a question I might even be covering that

material in subsequent slides and I want to make sure I get through the whole presentation the beginning of the talk is going to be some review material for some of you we're gonna move through the first 30 slides pretty quickly because I

understand that the majority of you are already using capnography and I want to spend the majority of our time in this presentation talking about the stuff that the advanced level the problem solving the troubleshooting and the

things that are really pertinent to your practice so that you have value that is gained from attending this presentation today

MRA safety is one of our top priorities in our unit we have set up MRI zones zone one being the patient waiting area

zone two is where they change and they get screened zone three is where our control room is and anyone who passes by zone three has to get screened our pet MRI injection room is actually inside zone three and zone four is an MRI

scanner itself we assess risk in our patients for their implants we were iterate to them the importance of bringing their implant card with them just so it's easier for us to assess the compatibility of their their implants

with MRI right now we have the capability of scanning cardiac pacemakers and defibrillators it just needs more coordination with our in-house cardiology service and the implant representative rest assure

expanders and aneurysm clips are so contraindicated inside the skin we tell our patients to remove some items that they are able to remove such as dentures hearing aids piercings and prosthetics if they have it as for radiation safety

we observed the concept of Alera or as low as reasonably achievable you know before we inject the patient with the isotope we keep them comfortable we give them blankets we give them the pillows and we tell them

after they get injected that they are radioactive so we try to limit our exposure to them after they get the injection now we try to keep our distance from them and we have shielding lead shielding within the pet MRI area

now we have lead shield syringes available for the nurses use and we have dedicated a hot hot bath room a hot room and radio pharmacy we Ritter we give these puppies this injection card to the patient after they get the scan and we

were either a to them the importance of this card we have the stories from our patients where after the after they scan gone home and they passed through the tunnels or the bridges that they actually have been pulled over by the

police because the police have very sensitive radioactive detectors there was one patient who may have forgotten his card may have lost his card and he got pulled over and the police had to call our institution to confirm that he

really did have an isotope injected we

riesen comes to us and he talks about

some theories on why we make mistakes so and we're gonna cover these and then we're gonna cover the Swiss cheese model which many of you may be aware of so sorry slips tend to hurt current situations that are so routine that

they've become rote so an example of a slip could be selecting the wrong drug from a drop-down alright so again slips and lapses occur when the correct plan is made but executed incorrectly so we have that drop down of drugs but we just

select the wrong one that's a slip a lapse is generally not visible because it's reflective of a memory failure so for instance we may have a patient who forgets to take their medications or we may have a prescriber that forgets to

take a drug off of a med rec so those are examples of slips or lapses mistakes or judgment failures they're more subtle and they're complex than slips and these can go undetected for a period of time and they're often left to

a difference of opinion well I don't do it the same way that Mary does it who doesn't do it the same way that sue does it so those are mistakes and their knowledge base we know the right thing to do but because we have outside things

that are occurring situations that are occurring we may have to do some workarounds and those workarounds aren't always safe or we're gonna get in and this is part of the anatomy we're gonna get into the anatomy a little bit later

and often mistakes are rule-based so we know the rules we know what we're supposed to do but for factors that are out of our control we bypass those and that's when mistakes can happen active failure failures are highly visible

errors and we usually see these because they have immediate consequences and then the latent failures their processes that are under the radar they come from not following policies and there may be a good reason why we're not following

policies but oftentimes we hear that we've always done it that way and that means they're rooted in culture so that's where the justa culture comes into play all right Swiss cheese model so this is this is probably a graphic

that's very familiar to a lot of people but it does really it's it's at the basis of a patient safety air so organizations have defenses those are the slices of cheese now those defenses although we'd like them to be solid

they're oftentimes not they're filled with holes because of human factors the human condition those active and latent failures the slips lapses and mistakes that happen to all of us it's a part of us so often some of those defenses get

penetrated but then there's another defense that stops let's take for example identifying a patient so a patient comes in and maybe they're not english-speaking they may be

spanish-speaking and so we call their name and they answer the answer yes because it's close enough right it's close just close enough and they come up we don't check anything we don't check don't verify their name and their date

of birth we pass them on to our prep recovery room and then we're getting them ready because we have confidence that Jane at our front desk she doesn't make an error she always identifies the right patient so we have a high level of

confidence in Jane it's not a bad thing that's an OK Fay but here again we're not doing what we know is in our policy so it's rule-based and that we know is the right thing to do so it's knowledge base so it becomes a

mistake that we're not checking our patients identity and date of birth and that patient gets back to let's say the interventional room and boom we stop because now we're doing a timeout and we identify that we have the wrong patient

for our procedure and it stops but sometimes these heirs line up the holes line up and it's just one of those days and we end up with a patient safety event at the end so now we come to the

fun for our learners too so what we did actually just this last cohort was we wanted to integrate basically some

innovation into our program and so basically we used a social media platform and so within our system it's called Yammer and so we warily wanted to like take pictures make it fun have comments what did they learn what kind

of things did they still have questions about different polling questions so really trying to get them more engaged and really understanding and really kind of looping back with each other and trying to network as well so that was

part of why we're using that platform as well we also invited previous cohorts to come back and really like maybe share some tips and tricks that they've learned so that this is still growing and so we're trying to this in a

different method and we also at the very end we really want to celebrate success so we really just truly say you know congratulations to our graduates essentially and it gives them that feeling of empowerment that they have

had some more formal training and that now that this and they know that they're not truly competent after this but it's just really that extra training that they get for the program and these are some of the testimonials

that we've had from our learners based on the evaluations and really it was just integral introduction to the cath lab and so a lot of times they feel very overwhelmed and as you can see this person you know had a better grasp of

the whys of the house and that it's not just the task anymore so they really understood like more that theory to practice component of it you know with us being you know working in the cath lab previously and those subject matter

experts our learners could really ask those questions and and based on our experiences and so they they felt like they could ask any question for that matter and they're just really that they recommend this to everyone who comes who

is new to cath lab for that matter and so really some of the other results that we have from our program too is a reduction in our turnover rate so at the beginning of January of last year the turnover rate as a system overall was 16

and a half and that dropped to 14 at the end of the year so it did have somewhat of a significant impact on our turnover rate within the whole health system in the cath lab and so what's the future now of our program so really it's based

in Phoenix for the majority of it and so now how do we get it to our partners who are down in Tucson and in the northern Colorado region so we're looking at different methods of how can we provide that virtual education how can we

provide it either via some sort of online platform but then when it comes to that time to the hands-on component that's the piece that we're still trying to figure out a lot of and like really how do we work with either a simulation

partners in those regions or how do we maybe videotape or work with our preceptors etc those are things that we still need to look at also - there's also been talk about having a program for our interventional radiology as well

in our electrophysiology so Academy is based on those again so you know trying to develop this program successfully means that we definitely need to have some metrics as you know with any program success is important so how do

we measure that success so focusing on those metrics and those outcomes and especially patient outcomes how did our program really impact the learners did it impact the learners at all um so what we've decided

is that I think measuring evaluating their competency at three months six months nine months and 12 months will give us enough data to ensure that the program was a success some of the tools that we developed on measuring those

outcomes is a post capability survey and this will be used following the Academy and following our cohort cohorts identifying any gaps in their learning and in their orientation also we want to make sure that we follow their pathways

so each of our learners on-boarded will have a pathway and milestones that they will follow with their preceptors and with their managers just to make sure that they're on track and that they need to be where they need to be at that time

we also have our annual competencies that again our new hires will receive upon hire and again following that one-year mark making sure that they are competent and still competent and some of the skills that they've learned in

the Academy obviously and on the job and then our advanced compensate through certifications and I mean I think that's really important this is the way of our future and having those advanced certifications is pretty important so we

really want to focus on how can you advance in the cath lab or an interventional radiology for that matter and develop those skills to help you get your certifications so this is an example of our post capability survey so

after we've completed the Academy with our learners we really want to go back and follow up with them so this is an example of some of the skills that we've had that we have in the cath lab such as procedural sedation close your devices

hemodynamics etc we want to ensure that they have the initial observation using the level of competence survey score from novice to expert and determined by their managers or their preceptors will ensure that they are

moving in the right direction so their initial observation is what they measure followed by subsequent of observations and that is also based on what the managers and the preceptors will feel as subsequent how many subsequent

observations they may need throughout the year to either throughout their orientation process or throughout the 12 months that we want to measure and so just to add on again about the certification so again we want to make

sure that we include so nurses the artis and then what certifications nurses and our teas can get so we really wanted to make sure that they are aware of the different types of certifications out there not that they're gonna get it

right away they need a little bit more experience first but this is just an opportunity for them to again on their pathway or milestone to kind of something to achieve and for anyone who's a big Disney fan like me

you see Hidden Mickey don't you okay

so my name's Heather I'm a nurse in interventional radiology at NYU Langone health in New York and I am the clinical resources for our department so what that means is I'm responsible for individualizing our education to meet the needs of our department and one of

the first things I wanted to look at when I took on the role was our procedural sedation practices and how we can improve by enhancing our knowledge this presentation includes many of the lessons and concepts that I learned

along the way that I think are really important to understanding how to effectively administer procedural sedation so our learning objectives are going to be a review of the guidelines pre-procedure assessment components

including airway assessment pharmacology of the medications that we give and intra procedure assessment so this is the 2018 AAS a practice guidelines for a procedural sedation by non anesthesiologist has everyone seen this

good great as so this is especially important because as you'll see the American College of Radiology and Society of interventional radiology were involved in its development so this is our guideline and I think it's really

important to look at this look at the practice recommendations and see how they align with your own practice and if there may be some changes you need to make first thing you always want to look at when you're reviewing any sort of

literature whether it's evidence-based guidelines or maybe just a review article is you want to look at the methodology that the author used to create the guideline so anybody know why that's important you just shout it out

so if I want to write a guideline for procedural sedation I could find a bunch of studies or review articles that fit my point of view and use them throw them at the bottom and that would be that but even if I use for an demise control

trials which are considered the gold standard of experimental research those randomized controlled trials could be poorly constructed randomized controlled trials so they may have introduced bias at some point into the study

that's skewed the outcome and the findings so you really want to make sure that the authors of the guideline that you're looking at appraise the research that they're using to support their recommendations and that's what the

aasa' task force did so they used randomized control trials and observational studies and then they categorize the strength and the quality of the study findings so as you're going through you'll see that statistically

significant was deemed a p-value of less than 0.01 and outcomes were designated as either beneficial harmful or equivocal equivocal meaning this findings were not significant one way or the other and then they also used

opinion based evidence from experts so they surveyed members of their task force and they did take into account some informal opinion from message boards and letters to the editor so I think a good example here is one of

their recommendations about capnography so they did a meta-analysis of randomized control trials that indicated that the use of continuous and title carbon dioxide monitoring was associated with a reduced frequency of hypoxemic

events when compared to monitoring without capnography and then you'll see at the end of the recommendations this category so for this particular recommendation they labeled it as category a1 - B evidence and what that's

telling you as category a means it was a randomized control trial which is great it was a level one meaning it's a high level of strength and quality and B is telling you that there was statistically significant findings that demonstrated

benefit to the patient now another recommendation that you may see as you're reading through would be the NPO guidelines so if you look at any of the literature about NPO recommendations it's really all expert

opinion because all of the evidence has shown equivocal findings so for example one of the studies they looked at compared the outcomes of patients who had clear liquids one hour prior to the procedure versus two hours and they

found no change in the outcome I think it's important when you're a provider and you're looking at that because you're gonna base your judgment calls on the evidence so you may have a patient come in who had tea up until one hour

prior to their procedure and you have to make a decision whether or not you want to cancel or proceed and you could look at the findings of the literature that shows that there really hasn't been a proven difference in outcomes so you may

decide to just do the procedure versus capnography there's very strong evidence showing it's beneficial to the patient always so I think this is a real big take-home point of why we do everything we do about procedural sedation all of

our assessments and enhancing our practice as a sedation is a continuum and practitioners intending to produce a given level of sedation should be able to rescue the patients whose level of sedation becomes deeper than initially

intended pre-procedure our assessment

happy to take any questions or in

ultrasound we don't usually use contrast but one of the procedures were doing for the treatment management of a pulmonary embolism is the ultrasound assisted Rumble Isis do we need contrast so for the thrombolysis is the catheter itself

so you still need to give contrast two to do the procedure but while the catheter is running you don't need to give any contrast four for that is that what you're we don't usually use contrast for ultrasound but

all right when you're treating how will you know that it sliced the clot is less what you frequently do is check the pressures so that catheter allows you to check the pressure and so once you start a patient so you do a pulmonary

angiogram which requires contrast and you put the ultrasound assisted thrombolysis catheter in the eCos catheter then after 24 hours or 12 hours you can measure a pressure directly through that catheter and if the

patient's pressure is reduced you don't have to give them anymore injections yeah and if we are using ultrasound for treatment is it possible to do it for diagnostic purposes No so not for non the prominent artists for

diagnostic imaging unless you're doing an echocardiogram which is technically ultrasound in the heart but for treatment otherwise you need you will need to inject some dye oh thank you

hi I'm Katrina I'm NGH I have one more question okay for your patients with chronic PE do most of them begin with acute PE or if they very separate sort of presentations that's that's a great question so all of them

had acute PE because you can't have chronic without acute but a lot of them are not ever caught so you'll have these patients who had PE that was silent that maybe one day they woke up and had a little bit of chest pain and then it

went away couple days later they thought they had a bronchitis or a cold and then you find out five years later that they had a huge PE that didn't affect them so badly and then they have these chronic findings they usually show up to their

family practice doctor again with hey I just can't walk as far as I can I have a little heaviness they rule them out from a heart attack but it turns out that they have CTF so you you all of them had a Q PE but it takes a lot of time and

effort to find out whether they truly have chronic PE so it's usually in a delayed fashion thank you all right well thank you guys again appreciate it [Applause]

talk here with something that's new on the horizon believe it or not it was actually on the horizon 20 years ago and then it went away because there were a lot of patients that were treated with a

lot of complications and it's making a resurgence and this is balloon pulmonary angioplasty or BPA for short so this is an intervention which may be feasible in non-operative candidates so I mentioned to the Jamison classification earlier

type 1 and type 2 disease should be treated with surgery again it should be treated is curative but patients with type 2 and a half or 3 disease can be treated with balloon pulmonary angioplasty in the right in the right

frame which means that a surgeon has said I cannot operate on this a medical doctor has said boy they're not going to get better with their medicine let's try something else well this is that something else and that's what involves

everyone in this room so this is these are usually staged interventions with potentially high radiation and contrast dose if you think about it it's like Venis recan and a pulmonary AVM all-in-one so it's a potentially a long

complex procedure with a lot of contrast and a lot of radiation but it can provide a lot of benefit to these patients I'm going to talk about the comp potential complications at the end which is one reason why not

everyone should do these all the time so this is a pulmonary angiogram from the literature when you're injecting a selective pulmonary artery you can see that this patient has multiple stenosis there's no real good flow there the

vessels look shriveled up like I mentioned to you before you can get a balloon across it and balloon the areas and then you can see afterwards so the image a on the left is before an image D is afterwards believe it or not this are

in the most experienced hands because the most experienced hands are for palm the BP AR in Japan they do hundreds of cases of these a year at each hospital I've personally only done five so but this is a something that I'm very

interested in and you can see how how much benefit it has for that patient another way you can see these are the webs and the bands that I mentioned to you earlier so what's interesting is that if you look on the first set of

images on the top and the images on the bottom those are the same patients it's the same view before top rows before and the bottom rows after balloon pulmonary angioplasty so the first image is a pulmonary angiogram where if you kind of

see this there's there's some area areas of haziness those are the webs and bands the image on the the middle is the blown-up views and you can see those areas and then the image on the right is intravascular ultrasound which I use

every day in my practice it's a catheter with an ultrasound on it and when you look at it on the top image image see you can see a lot of thrombus you're actually not seeing flow and on image F on the bottom you're seeing red which is

the blood flow so these patients can actually improve the luminal diameter bye-bye ballooning them you can treat occlusions again image on the left shows you a pulmonary artery with a basically an occlusion proximally and then after

you reek analyze it and balloon it you can see that they can get much more

pictures that we put up here this is our

simulation right so this is our mentis and I think it's very similar to what we have out in Hall there but this really adds a value to practicing and simulation our texts and our nurses were never able to practice during real cases

on real patients injecting contrast using radiation I mean those are the things that we really can't do theoretically and ethically right so this simulation piece was an important and valuable factor where we are able to

identify angiograms injecting contrast not really but simulation and using fluoroscopy again simulated fluoroscopy which is the best part of it is that the nurses can't use the fluoroscopy in Arizona and the techs can administer

medication so this is just an environment of playing this is our sandbox this is where we can come together and feel how the others work so that stimulation piece was was pretty

valuable this program is designed for an interprofessional growth with our scopes with our t's with our ends with providers with fellows with other adjunct staff that are in the lab so we wanted to grow that and and provide that

environment we don't want to segregate the nurses and the text we don't want to segregate that we want to be a team there shouldn't be a role attached to you when you're working everybody works as a team we do understand what our

licenses are we do understand how far we can go with our license but that should be the only thing that differentiates us between working in the lab so we wanted to bring that forward as well and the other piece is creating the simulation

scenario working with the mentis simulator and our simulation partners we wanted to develop a scenario for each of our cases so we we've picked five major cases that we do in that in the cath lab a left heart cath a right heart cath

maybe a pacemaker and we developed a scenario for our learners to actually follow and follow along with so from you know bringing your patient from pre holding or into the lab following them with their lab work making sure the

consents are signed all those priorities that we need to have for the patient to actually come into the lab and continue with the procedure so we did a mock scenario for all of the a mock simulation scenario for all of those so

all those cases that we did so that was also helpful for them to guide guide our learners this is the actual photograph

patient who did not come from the street so if you've been here for a few years

you've heard me talk about you know some of my friends this is also one of my other friends who has large fibroids but her fibroids were so big and they were not all very vascular and so I sent her to have surgery and she ended up having

a hysterectomy with removal of her cervix because of abnormal pap smears but her ovaries were left in place so our path forward after doing this procedure from 1995 a procedure that is not experimental a procedure that has

had a lot a lot of research done on it more research than most procedures that are done surgically or by interventional radiologists I'd say that it would require a partnership it is true that we can see patients on our own and we can

manage mostly everything but at the end of the day uterine artery embolization is still a palliative procedure because we don't know what causes fibroids to begin with and as long as the uterus is still there there's always a chance that

new fibroids will come back so in your practice and in mind I believe that a path forward is a sustaining program embolization program which is built on a relationship with the gynecologist that yes

I am as aggressive as any other interventionist that is out there but if this were my mom and that is my usual test for things I would say that where we would like to position ourselves is in the business of informing the

patient's as much as possible so that they can make an informed decision and that we're asking our gynecology partners to do the same is that if you're going to have a hysterectomy for a benign disease that you should demand

and we as a society and you as your sisters keeper should be asking for why am I not eligible for an embolization so si R is actually embarking on a major campaign in the next year or so it's called the vision to heal campaign and

it's all around providing education for this disease stage what I like to tell our patients and I'm almost finished here is when I talk to our gynecologist and to techs and nurses as well I said woody woody what should I expect right

that's what they want to know when I send my patient to you what should I expect and I say that what you should expect that Shawn and myself we're gonna tell the patient everything about fibroids we're gonna talk to them about

what the fibroids are the pathophysiology of it the same things I told you we're gonna tell them about the procedures that treat it we tell them about the options to do nothing we talk about all of the risk and the benefits

of the procedures especially of fibroid embolization and we start the workup to see if they're an appropriate candidate when they're an appropriate candidate we communicate with them and their OBGYN and then we schedule them for their

procedure in our practice there are a few of us who send our patients home on the same day and we let our patients know no one is kicking you out of the hospital if you can't go home that day then you'll get to stay but

most of our patients are able to go home that day and then we see our patients back in clinic somewhere between two and four months three months and six months and we own that patient follow-up their visits and after their year we have them

follow back up with their gynecologist and so that we're managing all of these sites and it comes back to that new again may not be so new for some of the people that have been doing clinical IR four years that shift that we own these

patients if you're a nurse in this room these are our patients these questions need to be answered by us in our department we do not believe that these patients should be calling their gynecologist for the answers to that

like what should I be doing right now should I be taking I haven't had a bowel movement and like that is something that we answer we're the ones that are given them the discharge instructions and we set them back up for their follow-up so

that was one example so these are there have a lot of potential complications reperfusion pulmonary edema is a very very big potential complication so you could get through the case patient does

great you open up multiple pulmonary arteries and then they start coughing up blood and then they end up started drowning in their own blood and the ICU so we do not want to push that and the initial papers that you can see down

below on that table they had a very high almost 10% in some cases pulmonary edema requiring treatment requiring patients being put on CPAP or being intubated and that is because they treated too much at one time

and so now as this when this first started in the early 2000s the operators were treating multiple segments at multiple times at one time and they were using large balloons and we figured out that that was what was killing patients

and so we changed our treatment so this is the first study that was ever performed for this it was performed by dr. Feinstein I believe this was published in circulation it was done in Harvard at MGH they had 18 patients with

36 month follow-up they all improved in their ability to walk as well as their lifestyle but many of them 11 out of 18 patients had reperfusion injury so this was the first paper and at that time it became the last paper because so many

patients did poorly but here's what they're sort of what they did and the ones that did okay they you could see that they had an improvement in the New York Heart Association classification again that just means they can walk

further they're not less short of breath and that they could walk further in 6 minutes which is again our sort of first test outcomes over time whence this has become increased so you can see that study was in 2001 and then

it kind of went away for a long time and it came back in 2012 in Japan where the most operators are there they've treated up to 255 procedures now since this slide was made we're up to a thousand in Japan and those patients are doing very

well but you'll notice that they have multiple procedures so again you don't try to one-and-done these patients they come back four to six times we've treated a couple patients where I work and we've treated that was patients four

times already and so they do much better but it's a slow slow and steady treatment so I want to wrap up with saying that the IR team is very critical to patients who are getting treated for PE we're involved in the diagnosis as

the radiology team acute and chronic PE it's very important to know as I've shown you in some of the examples and some of the images which when it's acute and versus chronic doing thrombolysis on a patient with chronic PE is useless all

you're doing is putting them at a risk you're not going to be able to break up that clot it's very important to have inter and multidisciplinary approach to patient care so interdisciplinary meaning everybody in this room nurses

technologists and physicians working together to take care of that patient that's on your table right now and multi-disciplinary because you have to work with cardiology vascular medicine the ICU teams and the

referring providers whether it's neurosurgery vascular surgery whomever it is who's Evers patient gets a PE you have to work together and it's very important again to have collaborative care in these patients if we're doing a

procedure and somebody notices that the patient is desaturating that's very very important when you're working in the pulmonary arteries if somebody notices that the patient's groin is bleeding you have to speak up so it's very important

that everybody is working together which is really what we need to do for these patients so there's my references and there's my kid so thank you guys very much hopefully this was helpful I'd be

alright and that's everything that we have so we are gonna welcome any questions any feedback comments the cost of the program so roughly that's a really so I want to say initially when

we first rolled it out it cost us roughly what was it two thousand three thousand dollars because again a lot of the supplies were donated a lot of the cost of the equipment cost etc that's really the big cost to us once we got

the mentis device that's added more and so that those devices are those simulation packages can cost in the hundreds of thousands is your question referring to what is the cost to the facility in the

department or to the learners yes can you hear me did we answer your question yes yeah we just yeah so they're the cost to the program for our learners they're they're already hired on so it doesn't cost the learners but about two

to three thousand dollars to start within the department as far as budget

plan as well so I wanted to talk a

little bit about imaging I know with our residents and fellows and radiology that's all we do is talk about the imaging and then when go on to IR we talked to them about the intervention but I think it's important

for everyone in this room to see more imaging and see what we're looking at because it's very important for us all to be doing on the same page whether you're a nurse a technologist a physician or anybody else in the room

we're all taking care of that patient and the more information we all have the better it is for that patient so quick primer on a PE imaging so this is a coned in view of a CT pulmonary angiogram so yeah sometimes you'll see

CTS that are that are set for a pulmonary artery's and you'll see some that are timed for the aorta but if the pulmonary arteries are well pacified you're gonna see thrombus so I have two arrows there showing you thrombus that's

sort of blocking the main pulmonary arteries on the left and right side on the patient's left so the one with the arrow that is a sort of very classic appearance of an intro luminal thrombus you can see a little rim of contrast

surrounding it and it's usually at branch points and it's centered in the vessel the one on the right with the arrow head is really at a big branch point so that's where the right lower lobe segmental branches are coming off

and you can see there's just a big amount of thrombus there you can see distal infarct so if you're looking in the long windows you'll see that there's this kind of it's called a mosaic perfusion but it also what kind of looks

like a cobweb and that's actually pulmonary infarct and maybe some blood there which actually will change what we're gonna do because in those cases freaken we will not perform PE thrombolysis it's also important to note

that acute and chronic PE which we're here to talk about today may look very similar on a CT scan and they have completely different treatment methods so here's a sagittal view from that same patient you can see the CT scan so

between the arrow heads is with the tram track appearance so you'll see that there's thrombus the grey stuff in the middle and you'll see the white contrasts surrounding it and kind of like a tram track and that's very

classic for acute PE and then of course where the big arrow is is just the big thrombus sitting there here's another view of a coronal this is actually on a young woman which I think we show some images on but you can see cannonball

looking thrombus in the main pulmonary arteries very classic variants for acute PE and then this is that same patient in a sagittal view again showing you in the left pulmonary kind of those big cannon balls of

thrombus here's some examples from the literature showing you the same thing when you're looking at an acute PE it's right centered on all the image all the way in the left if the classic thrombus is centered right in the middle of the

vessel you can usually see a rim of normal contrast around it and you can see on a sagittal or coronal view kind of like a thin strip of floating thrombus so the main therapies for acute

establish our guidelines this was something this was a question that we got when we did publish our journal article because you'll see when you do

see our guidelines we are not 100% in alignment with SAR that is because we used SAR in a detailed literature review and examined both of those sources but then we also have our own homegrown radiology database our nurses are

instrumental in collecting this data every biopsy patient we collect their medication list as well as their current lab values we've been doing this since 2002 and we currently have over 50 000 patients within that database so we pull

from that database to identify what is best what trends are we seeing what medications are we seeing that are causing issue in our practice so we're taking from our own clinical expertise and then we also have a great panel

within Mayo Clinic it's called ask me Oh expert this panel is made up of multiple physicians we have physicians from Department of Laboratory Medicine physicians from our anticoagulation practices we have our liver physicians

can need lots of different doctors we have two radiologists that also sit on that committee so it's a combined specialty panel so we take we took into consideration all of these factors to establish our guidelines our nurses use

these guidelines when they are performing pre-procedure phone calls so I love to the presentation yesterday from Johns Hopkins I believe where they're doing pre procedure phone calls but often times a whole week before we

don't have that yet but I would love to get to that point but right now our nurses are doing pre procedure phone calls within a few days prior to a patient's procedure and we are going through these guidelines to identify

what medication or risk factors these patients have and we're alerting our radiologists to see if there's any type of considerations that we may need to take if for example a patient has not stopped warfarin and

then they also look for if within our guidelines the patient needs lab values we determine if there's lot values ordered or if they have any within the medical record we want them within 30 days except for if the patient has known

or suspected liver disease we do want them more recently within 14 days or if a patient's on chemotherapy or one of those anti antagonists this is something I really need to stress to our nurses and I think I've gotten the point across

to you that these are guidelines only clinical decisions are made by the supervising radiologist so we've we've put this right in all of our guidelines in that yes these are guidelines that we can use those nurses to help triage our

patients and move and streamline our assessment process but sometimes it does further critical thinking and then discussion you want to go into what you

treatment is the ultrasound assisted catheter director thrombolysis or the echos divisor eCos this technique involves a slow infusion again over 12 to 24 hours

but the catheter has ultrasound built into it and that's thought to help disassociate fibrin strands and to help embed the thrombus bed the TPA into the thrombus I think most people have heard of or seeing eCos in the past

again lower doses much like the catheter directed so it's really the same type of procedure except at the end you're hooking up eCos rather than a uniform Craig Mac there is a lot of differences though in the sort of overall patient

experience because eCos as many of you know requires a lot more devices and for the patient's room so they're gonna have more pumps because it requires more fluid it requires more observation it beeps more frequently overnight but what

I will say is that there are studies that are used that have useful information with eCos and those are actually the main studies that have been done although they're all industry-sponsored but they're very

important studies nonetheless so the only device really that exists for this right now that approved is the eCos

a little bit more systemic versus catheter directed thrombolysis so once you've decided that a patient needs TPA what are the differences here well if

you give patients systemic TPA you're gonna give them a much more rapid delivery this is for those patients who have high-risk PE they're the ones who are coding for those patients you give them 200 milligrams of IV usually you

get 50 first and then another 150 over a very short time period they have a very high risk of bleeding as a result of that a catheter is much slower you're gonna infuse one milligram maybe which is what I think most people do

over several hours maybe a few maybe a day so it's slower targeted versus non targeted well catheter is much more targeted you're gonna give Pete you're gonna give the TPA right into the

pulmonary arteries that's the whole point in our in our thought process as a result you give a lot less drug so when you give a patient based off of some of the trials 24 milligrams of TPA over a 24-hour period that's a lot less than

200 milligrams in a 10 minute period and then the bleeding risk is very different for these patients catheter based treatments have a high bleeding risk but it's possibly lower than the initial bleeding risk of patients getting

systemic TPA so I wanted to go through a

good morning everyone my name is Jeanne Bulger and I'm the interventional nurse manager at dartmouth-hitchcock Medical Center and also the section supervisor of ultrasound and mammography I've been dartmouth-hitchcock about eight years four of which has been in my

current role hi everyone I am Tomi ocean Koya I am the service line quality specialist in radiology I've been with dartmouth-hitchcock for about six years I started out as a performance

improvement consultant at our Valley Institute and over the about the last three years I've been working in radiology managing a quality program across the multiple sites for our service line good morning I'm Chris

Kevin Logue I'm the operations manager at dartmouth-hitchcock for those of you don't know we're in Lebanon New Hampshire and we came from snow so we're very happy to be here I have been the operations manager for about eight or

nine years I was also the IR interventional nurse manager supervisor I was an interventional nurse and a critical care nurse so I'm very old I've been doing this for a long time so very happy to be here so let's start on

our journey in the innovation and application of real-time nursing dashboards so when I think about my journey I became a nurse to take care of people and with people there are always stories but typically data doesn't

always connect to those stories so today we are hoping to take you on a journey to understand how we've been able to use data to tell meaningful stories that show how our staff and patients are linked to organizational strategy we

have four objectives for you today the first one is to learn how to align strategy and data across all levels of the organization application of dashboards of the frontline would not be effective without this alignment second

numbers have feelings and tell their story we hope that you will learn as nurses that we can tell stories behind the numbers that can help us take better care of our patients the third objective

building and designing a nursing dashboard we hope that you will learn that we at dartmouth-hitchcock embarked on this journey to build meaningful dashboards using multidisciplinary team work and the last objective our

dashboard look interpret apply and assess model is to hope that you have learned how to apply the dashboards in real time to translate the numbers into meaning and purpose for the frontline staff everyday work the diagram on the

Left represents the amount of time it took for us to complete each objective in this project now hands off to Chris to talk about strategy Thank You Jeanne

catheter some other things that we can do is mechanical intervention so if you have a patient usually with massive PE

or the inner or the high-risk B you got to do something to help them out so what we do is put a pigtail catheter and inject a little bit of TPA on the table and then twirl the pigtail or put a wire through the side part of the pigtail and

make it sort of a mechanical fragment fragmentation the problem with that is that fragmented clot goes downstream so when it's in a main pulmonary artery it actually has less surface area than it is when it is in a distal pulmonary

capillary so when you break that clot up you have to be careful because it can actually make the patient worse the benefit there there's no thrombolytic so if we're doing this we we generally are doing it in patients who can't either

receive TPA at all frequently we get patients with who have have had recent spine surgery who get a massive PE had brain surgery get a massive PE and you have to try to treat them without any TPA or even heparin the drawbacks are

that again it increases pulmonary vascular resistance by sending all those little pieces of clot into the small pulmonary arteries and capillaries and it makes it actually much worse in some patients again there's no control trials

and sometimes you need to have a bigger

to talk about is indirect angiography this is kind of a neat trick to suggest to your intervention list as a problem solver we were asked to ablate this lesion and it looked kind of funny this patient had a resection for HCC they

thought this was a recurrence so we bring the comb beam CT and we do an angio and it doesn't enhance so this is an image here of indirect port ography so what you can do is an SMA run and see at which point along the

run do you pacify the portal vein and you just set up your cone beam CT for that time so you just repeat your injection and now your pacifying the entire portal vein even though you haven't selected it and what to show

well this was a portal aneurysm after resection with a little bit of clot in it the patient went on some aspirin and it resolved in three months so back to our first patient what do you do for someone who has HCC that's invading the

heart this patient underwent 2y 90s bland embolization microwave ablation chemotherapy and SBRT and he's an eight-year survivor so it's one of those things where certainly with the correct patient selection you can find the right

things to do for someone I think that usually our best results come from our interdisciplinary consensus in terms of trying to use the unique advantages that individual therapies have and IO is just one of those but this is an important

lesson to our whole group that you know a lot of times you get your best results when you use things like a team approach so in summary there are applications to IO prior to surgery to make people surgical candidates there are definitive

treatments ie your cancer will be treated definitively with curative intent a lot of times we can save when people have tried cure intent and weren't able to and obviously to palliate folks to try to buy them time

and quality of life thermal ablation is safe and effective for small lesions but it's limited by the adjacent anatomy y9t is not an ischemic therapy it's an ablative therapy you're putting small ablative radioactive particles within

the lesion and just using the blood supply as a conduit for your brachytherapy and you can use this as a new admin application to make people safer surgical candidates when you apply to the entire ride a panic globe

thanks everyone appreciate it [Applause] [Music]

I'm Nikki Jensen Nicole is what my mother calls me but that's alright thank you all for joining us today I am the clinical resource nas I work in a clinical nurse specialist position I graduated in May so I'll finally be called the clinical nurse specialist

after I passed my boards in nonvascular radiology so at Mayo Clinic Rochester we are kind of split up between I are in our IR practice where we have non vascular procedural Center CT MRI ultrasound guided procedures we'll go

over a list of our standard perform procedures as well as our neuro interventional and vascular interventional practice so Kerri and I work in the non vascular so we do not do any neuro interventional or vascular

vascular interventional procedures so these guidelines are going to focus on your LR CT or ultrasound guided procedures how many of you went to the combined session this morning great this is going to be an overview because what

we saw presented there really reiterates what we are have brought into our practice but then we're also going to share how we created nursing guidelines and how we rolled that into our practice this is Carrie Carrie is a staff nurse

in our department I worked as a staff nurse for seven years prior to this position I've been in this position now for four years and really enjoy it I do want to give a little shout-out to Carrie and I presented or sorry we

published an article in the June 28th volume 37 issue - that really coincides with our presentation today so I would encourage you to read that publication and then you'll get additional information on how we did this yes all

right we have nothing to disclose unfortunately or fortunately right so the purpose of this presentation is to help you all understand the importance of creating reviewing the literature

understanding your for one your coagulation casket as well cascade as well as anticoagulants that are out there or new up-and-coming medications and understanding that yes it's very important to establish and create these

guidelines so that within your practice you don't have differing radiologists that have differing opinions if you're working with doctor so-and-so today you need to worry about these labs if you're working with you know dr. Johnson

tomorrow he doesn't care about the labs we did this to help standardize that to help reduce the amount of questions our nurses have how many times we're interrupting our radiologists but then also we need to take into consideration

the importance of the patients and their different disease processes and we'll be going over that too so it's nice to have established guidelines but then also we need to take into consideration why patients are on certain medications this

here is our list of objectives I'm not going to read them for you you can all read them and we've provided you all with handouts too but really we want to just help kind of explain mechanism of actions and different medications and

how we established our guidelines this here is where Kari and I come from full disclosure we do have snow on the ground so these pictures were not taken before we came we are really enjoying this nice warm weather but for those of you who

are not familiar with the history of Mayo Clinic in Rochester who we have a hundred and fifty plus year tradition of implementing evidence-based care to assure the needs of our patient come first we are divided up into one

downtown campus but we have three different main areas so we have our st. Mary's Hospital this is where Kerry is based out of this is this houses most all of our ICUs as well as most all of our inpatients so we do a lot of

inpatients but we also see outpatients in this hospital Rochester Methodist Hospital this is where our he mock patients typically are we do have one ICU within Hospital as well but then right here my

office is right there this is our Mayo downtown campus so this is where most of our patients come for outside procedures or outpatient diagnostic imaging exams this here is the group that I'm part of the clinical nursing specialist group

within our clinical nursing specialist group there are 77 of us there are five like myself clinical resources as we have not graduated as of yet I'm right there in the middle w

that work in over 70 ambulatory areas in 58 inpatient areas we also support some areas in our Arizona and Florida campuses and then we have Mayo Clinic Health System hospitals that are scattered throughout Iowa

Wisconsin in Minnesota as well I am the only one in radiology across all of our

there are advantages of this modality one there's less radiation exposure for

the patient we receive about three millisieverts of background radiation every year with one PET scan a patient can get up to eight years worth of background radiation in just one skin the only exposure of radiation a patient

gets in a pet MRI is through the isotope pet MRI has a better disease characterization especially for areas in a Patou biliary region the pelvic areas and the kidneys information and the relationship between lesions and

adjacent tissue is better delineated with the pet MRI so it's easier to see which part is cancerous and which partners normal cells there are varying opinions and research studies are being done to make a determination if pet MRI

is a better modality than pet CTS well PET CT is a lower-cost skin has increased accessibility there are more PET scanners available and more more technologists are trained for this modality PET CT is a shorter skin there

are no contraindications for affairs implants pet CTS are preferred method for imaging the lungs of thoracic nodules and bone structures however with a pet MRI it's good for soft tissue organs such as the brain the muscle

delivered the kidneys the pancreas our GYN pelvic structures such as ovaries the uterus and cervix and also the prostate there are limitations of this skin one it is a much longer skin one whole body pet MRI can last at least

about an hour there are contraindications with certain implants due to the magnetic factor of the of this test and is not preferred for imaging air-filled structures because it can give off artifacts there

are weight limitations for our machine our machine holes can hold up to about 500 pounds of weight it is this our machine as smaller bore compared to the white board MRI the MRI whiteboy is about 70 centimeters in diameter

our pet MRI machine is only 60 centimeters in diameter in this picture the difference of the 10 centimeter difference doesn't seem much however if you put a patient in there and this is one of our coworkers

he is 270 pounds and 6 feet tall and the white board MRI his shoulders fit comfortably well inside it in the sky inside the scanner however in this pet MRI machine he said he did feel a little snug and a little tight inside

but you also have to take an account that we have to put coils on top of our patients that 10 centimeters does make a big difference the coils will help us give the good quality images that we like and I also have to note that we

have to put the head coil or the helmet on top of the patient's head to give good images of the brain the reason why the pet MRI scanner is smaller is because we have to make room for the pet detectors we try to make it bigger the

gradient coil on the radiofrequency coil have to be further away from the center of the magnet and that compromises the quality of our images so which patient

how do I become a cath lab nurse or RT and so the traditional route really was you know if you worked in as an arti worked really general radiology or you worked interventional radiology or if you were a nurse you could come from ICU

or the emergency room pack uor or PC you are progressive care and work with your preceptors get that on-the-job training and so again there's that whole you know rich waiting you know maybe bad behaviors and creating shortcuts etc and

then you have your cath lab staff so really the early beginnings to our program kind of was twofold so we had an existing virtual program which was basically some modules online working with one of the textbooks that we have

and really working with the preceptors so then we decided how can we create this pipeline for new RTS because we're having a huge shortage of RAD techs and so initially our program was six weeks and then we kind of as we whittled it

down we can went into this three week program now and it's basically an adjunct to their orientation program it doesn't take the place of it it just adds into it and so now the other thing too is what we're looking at is how does

this look like in the future and how do we really truly impact our patient care outcomes so now when someone says how do I become a cath lab RN or RT we have again the traditional route but now we've added in this systemized the

standardized cath lab Academy working with our preceptors and now we have staff our cath lab staff and so in

PE the first one of course is

anticoagulation so heparin and bridging the patient to coumadin or now aid a direct oral anticoagulant is really the mainstay of treatment most patients again 55 percent of patients with PE have low risk PE all of those patients

should be on according to the chest guidelines three months of anticoagulation so they're gonna get heparin as an inpatient if they even need it and they're gonna get sent home on lovenox bridge to coumadin or they're

gonna get the one of the new drugs like Xarelto or Eliquis but here's all the other things that we do so these patients that are in the intermediate high risk so I'm gonna try to keep saying those terms to try to kind of put

that in everyone's brain because I think the massive and sub massive PE is what everyone used to talk about but we want to keep up with our colleagues in cardiology who are using the correct terminology we're gonna say high risk

and an intermediate but in those patients - intermediate high risk or Matt or the high risk PE patients we're gonna be treating them with systemic thrombolysis catheter directed thrombolysis ultrasound assisted

thrombolysis and maybe some real lytic and elected me or thrombectomy there's other techniques that we can use for one-time removal of clot like rotational and electa me suction thrombus fragmentation and then of course

surgical mblaq t'me so when anticoagulation is not enough so I like to show this slide because it shows the difference between anticoagulation and thrombolysis they are very different and sometimes I think everybody in this room

understands the difference but I think our referring providers don't and so when we when we get consulted and we recommend anticoagulation they're like yeah TPA well that's not the right thing so anticoagulation stops the clotting

process so when you start a patient on a heparin drip they should theoretically no longer before new thrombus on that thrombus so when you have thrombus in a vessel you get a cannon you get a snowball effect more

and more thrombus is gonna want to form heparin stops that TPA however for thrombolysis actually reverses the clouding process so that tissue plasminogen activator or streptokinase or uro kindness will actually dissolve

clot so there you're stopping new clot forming versus actually dissolving clot anticoagulation allows for natural thrombolysis so your body has its own TPA and so when you put a patient on heparin you're allowing your natural

body defenses to work you're giving it more time TPA accelerates that process so you give TPA either systemically or through a catheter you're really speeding up that process anticoagulation on its own has a

lower bleeding risk you're putting a patient on heparin or Combe it in it's it is less but it is still real thrombolysis however is a very very high bleeding risk patients when I when I consult a patient for thrombolysis I

tell them that we are about to do give them the absolute strongest blood clot thinning agent or an reversal agent which is the TPA and we're gonna just run it through your veins for hours and hours

um and that sort of gives them an idea of what we're doing anticoagulation in and of itself is really not invasive you just give it through an IV or even a pill thrombolysis however is given definitely through an IV through

systemic means and a large volume there thereafter or catheter directed so again

fine versed is extensively metabolized by the liver so I mentioned the Cy p450

systems so the specific enzyme that metabolizes versed cyp3a4 now that sounds like way too much information but what's important about that is there are some drugs that are also metabolized by the same enzyme that are inhibitors of

this enzyme and one of them is verapamil so at my institution when you order verapamil and versed together a warning comes up that's telling you that the verapamil may potentiate the effect of the versed and that's because the

verapamil is inhibiting the metabolism of the versed which means it's sticking around longer it's a consideration because we give wrap a mill for our radial access cases for a Vizsla spasm prophylaxis and neural patients yes yeah

a lot of neural patients for a cerebral vasospasm properties it's 97 percent protein bound so that means if you have a patient who has low serum albumin you may see a more potent effect right away because they don't have as an

a lot of protein circulating so that drug won't have protein to bind to half life in patients with renal failure reduced elimination of an act of the active metabolite can cause drug accumulation and prolonged sedation and

I'll tell you why that's especially important in the next couple of slides and then considerations prolonged tap life and the elderly obese and reduce hepatic and kidney function I think most of us know this but I think it kind of

helps to drive at home if you know why why is it prolonged half life in reduced kidney function well it's because it's 97% protein bound and it needs to be excreted by the kidney and you have an active metabolite circulating around not

getting cleared opioids are the mainstay

higher procedures that get done in the country so they are from being basics such as being para sentences and in some

centers being quite complex in Euro work and there are centers where these none of all those that IR procedures being available so it's a very unequal distribution of provision of IR services and like I mentioned earlier on vascular

surgeons and cardiologists have basically taken over the peripheral vascular work and iogic work and other known neuro speciality such as bid early interventions for example saying that these two surgeons who are in some

remote centers who are doing their own provision as biliary basic interventions there is one neuro surgeon who went and had neuro imaging and then your interventional training who is now hundred percent doing a mural

intervention so as far as procedures go my day can be in diagnostic work and you might be dreaming you doing a paracentesis the next thing you might be doing some some I our basic IR and on the same day you might be doing a set

procedure so quite varied but not available in all centers as one would want as fine stuff goes the technology

thrombectomy is another popular way of treating patients there's a lot of different aspiration catheters the SPX catheter is actually not available currently in the US but what it basically is I can have the rectum a

device that spins in such backlot the Indigo thrombectomy system from penumbra is a yet another device that sucks out clot I think many of us have used that it's kind of like a vacuum cleaner but usually more like a dust

hand vac where it's going to suck up thrombus the angio vac is much more like a Hoover where you're going to use and put a patient on veno-venous bypass that requires a 22 French sheath and a 17 French sheath but that will take out

thrombus I personally prefer using NGO vac in the IVC in big large thrombus for that and not in the pulmonary arteries because it's very inflexible but it's very very useful in a few patient populations in

all of these devices there is no TPA that needs to be given you're just sucking out the clot and you're actually removing it from the patient's body rather than dissolving it and sending it downstream the drawbacks on all of these

devices is their larger access points the SP or X is around six French although that's not that much bigger penumbra device is 8 French and the as we mentioned the angio vac is 22 French

Disclaimer: Content and materials on Medlantis are provided for educational purposes only, and are intended for use by medical professionals, not to be used self-diagnosis or self-treatment. It is not intended as, nor should it be, a substitute for independent professional medical care. Medical practitioners must make their own independent assessment before suggesting a diagnosis or recommending or instituting a course of treatment. The content and materials on Medlantis should not in any way be seen as a replacement for consultation with colleagues or other sources, or as a substitute for conventional training and study.